[DEHAI] [Truthdig's Robert Scheer]: The Root of Madoff’s Evil

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Zeyhilel@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 01 2009 - 10:16:05 EDT

The Root of Madoff’s Evil
Posted on Jul 1, 2009
(http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090701_the_root_of_madoffs_evil/) )

By _Robert Scheer_ (http://www.truthdig.com/about/staff/4)
How convenient for the judge and the media to paint Bernard Madoff as Mr.
 Evil, a uniquely venal blight on an otherwise responsible financial
industry in which money is handled honestly and with transparency.
Madoff, sentenced Monday to 150 years in prison for bilking investors of
billions, should be exhibit A in why the dark world of totally unregulated
private money managers and hedge funds should be opened to the light of
systematic government supervision. Instead, he is being treated as an aberrant
menace, with the danger removed once the devil incarnate, as his victims
describe him, is locked up and the key thrown away.
For goodness’ sake this was not some sort of weird outsider who flipped
out, but rather a key developer of the modern system of electronic trading
and a founder and chairman of Nasdaq. Madoff often was called upon to help
write the rules on financial regulation and therefore became quite expert at
subverting them.
As Securities and Exchange Commission Inspector General H. David Kotz
testified before Congress, the inspector general’s office is looking into “
[t]he extent to which the reputation and status of Bernard Madoff, and the
fact that he served on SEC Advisory Committees, participated on securities
industry boards and panels, and had social and professional relationships with
SEC officials, may have affected commission decisions regarding
investigations, examinations and inspections of his firm.”
Those relationships were close (the personal ties included the marriage of
one of Madoff’s nieces to an SEC official) and stretched out over the
decades during which Madoff was a major player on Wall Street. At the very time
back in 1999 when the SEC was being formally warned that a Madoff scam was
under way, Madoff was consulting with then-SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt Jr.
on regulatory matters. When Levitt retired a year later, Madoff was quoted
in the trades as paying tribute to him: “He brought all of us to the
negotiating table time and time again, on a whole host of issues, and to a greater
extent than any other SEC chairman.”
Levitt wrote in a January 2009 opinion article in The Wall Street Journal,
“I knew Bernie Madoff and had no reason to believe he was not a legitimate
market maker, nor did anyone at that time know he was acting as an adviser
to outside investors.”
Nor was he required to tell anyone. And even if he had been, it’s unlikely
that part of Madoff’s business would have been looked into. In the
deregulatory mania of the preceding two decades, it had been assumed that such
managers did not need regulating, and funding for the SEC kept getting cut. As
Levitt noted in the article, it would only get worse:
“Since 2002, the number of investment advisers—such as Madoff Securities—
has increased by 50%. Yet enforcement resources have been flat or even
reduced. … As a result, only about 10% of investment advisers can expect to be
examined every three years, and the goal of inspecting every adviser once
every five years—laughably light oversight in its own right—has been
Money for proper oversight was not allocated because the prevailing
ideology regarding private investment firms—embraced by President Bill Clinton
ever as fervently as President George W. Bush would later—was the gospel of
radical financial deregulation, a practice that has landed us in the larger
banking mess. As with the trading in unregulated derivatives, all of the
operations of private investor groups, such as hedge funds, were thought not
to require government supervision because these were conducted by
professional financiers dealing with sophisticated investors who knew what they were
doing. If the investment went south, it was on their dime and there would
be no innocent victims.
As we saw with the collapse of AIG and now Madoff, that notion is false
because private investment contracts can involve the resources of charitable
organizations and pension funds and can end up costing the homes, savings
and jobs of ordinary citizens who have no idea of which end of this arcane
stuff is up.
When Levitt worked for Clinton as head of the SEC, he teamed up with Alan
Greenspan, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers to destroy what remained of
financial service industry regulation imposed by President Franklin Roosevelt
in response to the Great Depression. In recent years Levitt, alone among
that gang of four, has criticized that action and accepted some personal
responsibility for the subsequent financial meltdown.
He was right again when he stated in his January article: “The Madoff
scandal should be a wake-up call for more consistent, uniform, and rigorous
regulation of investment advising … the final prod for a fundamental reform of
the financial regulatory structure. … ”
He gets it. Let’s hope that Congress does too and is not fooled by the
argument of Wall Street lobbyists that Madoff was a lone rotten apple now
safely discarded. <<><><><>>
**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the
grill. (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2009
All rights reserved