From: wolda002@umn.edu
Date: Tue Sep 28 2010 - 02:20:50 EDT
Tuesday, Sep. 07, 2010
Balancing Counterterrorism and Democracy in Uganda 
By Ioannis Gatsiounis / Kampala
U.S. President Barack Obama took office promising to make good governance 
the cornerstone of his African policy, and Uganda came to typify the shift 
in priorities. Repeated attempts by President Yoweri Museveni to meet with 
Obama were denied, apparently in response to Uganda's sluggish pace of 
political reform ahead of presidential elections in February. President 
Obama also directly challenged Museveni to lift his support for a draconian 
bill persecuting gays.
But just as the 9/11 attacks drew the U.S. closer to autocratic Arab 
regimes whose security services were needed to help fight al-Qaeda, so have 
the July 11 bombings of two Kampala nightspots by the Somalia-based 
al-Shabab militant group reminded the Obama Administration of Uganda's 
importance in the battle against extremism in the Horn of Africa. And that 
strategic interdependency challenges the U.S. democracy agenda. (See a 
video of the Lord's Resistance Army hunting children in Sudan.)
"Washington is now forced to do a balancing act," says Livingstone 
Sweanyana, executive director at the Foundation for Human Rights Initiative 
in Kampala. "If the U.S. is going to work with Museveni on al-Shabab, the 
U.S. can't afford to see or treat him as an unfriendly force."
U.S. officials insist that democratic reform still figures at the top of 
Washington's agenda in Uganda. But as Museveni's National Resistance 
Movement (NRM) has used the July 11 terror attacks as a pretext to shrink 
the political space, Washington's critique hasn't kept pace. Three days 
after the bombings, parliament passed a bill enabling phone-tapping. Weeks 
later, nationwide demonstrations demanding an independent election 
commission were violently suppressed on grounds that they could be 
exploited by terrorists. And the media have since been banned from 
commenting on the twin bombings. (Can Uganda forgive the Lord's Resistance 
Army?)
Following the crackdown on protests calling for an election commission, 
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson did 
say that security concerns were no justification for squelching dissent. 
Curiously, however, the previous day he told a reporter on the sidelines of 
an African Union (A.U.) summit in Kampala that Museveni had been "elected 
openly and transparently in free and fair elections," contradicting a 2006 
State Department assessment that the polls had been "marred by serious 
irregularities." (See pictures of Uganda.)
The about-face may be driven by growing desperation. At the same A.U. 
summit, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said that "ending the threat of 
al-Shabab to the world will take more than just law enforcement" and that 
Washington was therefore going to work closely "to support the African 
Union's [military] mission in Somalia [AMISOM]." Washington is looking to 
boost current troop levels from 8,000 — most of them from Burundi and 
Uganda — to 20,000. The problem is that few member states other than 
Uganda have volunteered to step up. Museveni, a former rebel leader, is 
reportedly prepared to mobilize that many troops on his own and has been 
leading calls to switch AMISOM's mandate from peacekeeping to peace 
enforcement.
"The U.S. is depending on Uganda to play a role in Somalia to rein in 
extremist forces," says James Tumusiime, managing editor of the 
opposition-leaning Observer weekly. "And in light of the attacks, the U.S. 
is probably beginning to think they're better off with a stable, 
functioning style of leadership in Uganda — someone who's not necessarily 
a democrat but a guy in control — rather than support change for 
democracy's sake."
U.S. diplomats in Kampala say much of their democracy-promotion work is 
low-key. One example is their success in persuading Uganda to put 
voter-registration lists online to allow the validation of voter 
identities. USAID invested around $2 million on democracy and governance 
programs last year, and that figure is expected to hit $10 million this 
year. Officials argue that security and democracy are mutually reinforcing.
But support for the key opposition demand of an independent election 
commission appears to be waning, says Wafula Oguttu, spokesperson for the 
leading opposition party Forum for Democratic Change (FDC). Recalling 
Washington's silence after the recent suppression of demonstrations — in 
which 80 people were arrested and some claimed to have been tortured — 
Oguttu says, "The U.S. likely would have spoken out against that prior to 
al-Shabab." Now the opposition is anxiously awaiting U.S. Secretary of 
State Hillary Clinton's quarterly report on Uganda, due late this month, 
after Congress ordered the State Department to tightly monitor Uganda's 
election process. "A lot of bad things have happened since May," says 
Oguttu, and he expects the report to reflect that fact.
The last such report, issued in May, irritated NRM leaders, but prompted no 
constructive action. Indeed the party's primary polls on Monday were marred 
by confusion and allegations of ballot-stuffing. Opposition groups hope 
that Washington will use its leverage as one of Uganda's leading aid donors 
to press for change. But they fear the U.S. lacks the resolve to press the 
issue, leaving Uganda's election process heavily skewed toward the ruling 
party.
Challenges to the legitimacy of the electoral process raise the danger of 
large-scale political violence, analysts warn. Last September, riots in 
Kampala left 17 people dead after the king of Buganda kingdom was prevented 
by Museveni from visiting a nearby district.
"We have shown restraint so far," says the FDC's Oguttu. But if the 
mechanisms for free and fair elections fail to materialize, he says, "we're 
going to have a little bit of trouble." He predicts the youth will grow 
more vocal and could target the destruction of election-commission offices. 
Meanwhile, the opposition is mulling the option of boycotting February's 
elections. Whatever the case may be, he says, "expect fireworks." And a new 
round of political turmoil, of course, is unlikely to help promote either 
democracy or security.
See TIME's Pictures of the Week.