Sudanese parties endorse mediation proposals for framework on the Two Areas
_____
November 16, 2014 (ADDIS ABABA) - The Sudanese government and the Sudan
People's Liberation Movement - North (SPLM-N) endorsed on Saturday all the
proposals made by the African mediation paving way for the signing a
framework agreement on the conflict in the Two Areas.
Following the long discussions held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, the African
Union High-Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) agreed with the two parties to
hold a meeting on Sunday to approve the draft agreement ahead of the
signing.
Both sides confirmed to Sudan Tribune the breakthrough reached in the talks.
The two sides, however, said they await to read the draft that the AUHIP
will submit during Sunday's meeting, to be held at 05:00pm local time.
The head of the Sudanese government delegation, Ibrahim Ghandour, rejected
on Friday a new draft agreement presented by the mediation as it includes a
number of additional points particularly a roadmap by the African peace and
security body aiming to facilitate the participation of rebels in the
national dialogue.
On Saturday, however, Ghandour informed the AUHIP that his government
accepts the roadmap of the African Union Peace and Security Council included
in its decision number 456 of 12 September.
A member of the government delegation who spoke to Sudan Tribune on the
condition of anonymity said the delegations and the mediation started to
review the draft agreement, approving it point by point.
"We finished at five o'clock and the mediators vowed to submit the final
draft on Sunday if they fail to do that on Saturday night in order to
prepare for Sunday's meeting," he said.
The source further said that a number of points were discussed, adding that
the parties entrusted the mediation with the editing of the reached
compromises.
Multiples sources from both sides told Sudan Tribune that the government
delegation refused to include "Paris Declaration" in the framework
agreement, but suggested to use another formulation referring to this
agreement between the rebel groups and the National Umma Party.
The parties also agreed to discard the mention to the tripartite
humanitarian agreement from the framework agreement and agreed instead to
negotiate a new deal, as they diverge on its implementation.
On security arrangements, the two parties also agreed to use the expression
"cessation of hostilities and comprehensive ceasefire agreement".
Previously, the rebels refused a ceasefire agreement at this stage of the
talks while Khartoum rejected any truce.
The Sudanese government also accepted the all parties conference that the
headquarters of the African Union has proposed in the African roadmap.
Initially, Khartoum said it would be difficult to move over 600 people to
Addis Ababa.
This predatory meeting, which will be facilitated by the AUHIP, should reach
a framework agreement for the national dialogue, including the general
elections and the transitional period.
It will also discuss the guarantees enabling the rebels to return to
Khartoum.
The two parties agreed that the text of the framework agreement should refer
to the who process by citing the AUPSC decision number 456.
SPLM-N'S CLARIFICATION
The spokesperson of the SPLM-N negotiating delegation, Mubarak Ardol, issued
a statement on Saturday night denying reports released in Khartoum saying
the rebel group accepted to discard the Paris Declaration from the framework
agreement.
"We will sign an agreement, only after the government approval of the
roadmap signed by the forces of Paris Declaration and the (national dialogue
committee ) 7+7. Also we will not accept attempts aiming to exclude the SRF
forces, DUP and the other opposition forces," Ardol said.
He accused "the security apparatus" of the ruling National Congress Party of
fabricating half-truths and rumours about what was going on at the
negotiating table
He said the cessation of hostilities in South Kordofan and Blue Nile will
take place within the framework of the roadmap included in the AU decision
456, which provides to hold two tracks within one peace process.
He further underscored that the ongoing discussions were part of efforts to
achieve comprehensive peace and democratic change in the country.