Yemane Tsegay MS.
Aerospace Engineer/Legal Advocacy

March 11, 2016

Wiki Leaks, Raimoq.com:Feb.24, 2016 Exposes that Sanctions Imposed against Eritrea are politically motivated to divert the attention from Ethiopia’s Occupation of Sovereign Eritrean territory, including the town of Badme. The Sanction was imposed on 23 December 2009, but the concerted and coordinated disinformation campaign started in 2006, way before the Somalia and Eritrea/Djibouti Issues were taken as an agenda item by the UN Security Council. [1]

The UN COI/Social Justice Activists allegedly claimed that “They found violations in the areas of extrajudicial executions, torture (including sexual torture), national service and forced labour may constitute crimes against humanity in the State of Eritrea”.   This is part of the international campaigning smear strategy.  The COI report on Eritrea June 5, 2015 [2]

“UNITED NATIONS (Sputnik) — some members of the UN Security Council misuse sanctions, acting as if they are entitled to control certain countries and entire regions of the world” said,– Russian Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Vladimir Safronkov, Feb. 12, 2016 [3]

1. Introduction

The UN Commission of Inquiry on human rights in Eritrea (UNCOI), World Bank, IMF, Amnesty International (AI) campaigned to internationally isolate and demonize the Eritrean Government’ coupled by the criminal activities of Woyane of Tigray (Ethiopia) through: financing: Websites/Radios news outlets for the purpose of attacking with unfettered inflammatory rhetoric with verbal and written materials against the PFDJ leaderships in the State of Eritrea.  Their attack display with saber-rattling and falsely invented accusations against the credibility and independence of Eritrea.  There are also other groups known as International Political Activists Organizations working in conjunction with the COI Human Rights on Eritrea (for clarity all these are called Social Justice Activists), lacks procedural of fairness and truth have disseminated lies after lies and have already put a minor damage on our youth emotional state and on some youngsters it even caused confusions and made them as runaway kids.

All these madness evil actions against Eritrea have severely angered all Eritrean citizens in every corner of the world with the exception of small number of traitors.  These traitors have become the main informants to the COI false Final Report writing.  They have been targeting everything the government does as bases for their manufactured lies and also a means for spreading rumors with distortions/misrepresentations of truth.  Now they have crossed the Line of international law with no sense of decency.

Social Justice Ideologue prepares them to use fraudulent misinformation and they never care or substantiate their claims at any level.  The verbal fraudulent emotive languages they have been using toward our youth were aimed for purposes of disintegration within the Eritrean Nationals.  All these evil activities motive were: Combined concerted efforts to repeatedly violate the legal, ethical, and moral principles of the Nation of Eritrea and in particular to undermine the PFDJ leadership, who were the liberators of yesterday and are the leaders of today.  In order, to advance their distorted view toward the Nation of Eritrea they have developed the following few examples of their smear strategy:

Primarily: To discredit the Sovereign Legal Right of Eritrea hiding behind the Human Rights issues maligning Eritrea due process and rule of law, criticized it with manufactured lies with a coordinated strategy to internationally isolate Eritrea and weaken its ability to even protect its citizens from asymmetrical war.  The COI has falsely depicting that Eritrea is a state of Human Rights violator and has jailed many people.  The leadership of the Eritrean Government has been charged in administering the country with a harsh repression system resulting in ruling by fear instead of ruling by law.

Secondary: New charge added to the Eritrean Government that is having only one political party system with no opposition political parties. [4]

(Meaning Eritrea has not established multi political parties sometimes numbering up to 30 political parties conducive for rigging public elections). This was the vision and intention of Dr. Berekt’s advocacy to see Eritrea adhere to multi party practices through his advanced fraudulent written materials (constitution, books) and he is continuously spouting the same fraudulent rhetoric in order to guaranty failure of the Nation of Eritrea.

Currently, the Government of Eritrea has a Firewall Management Lessons-Learned System (MLLS) in place intended to enhance the political and legal need for the protection of the Nation of Eritrea.[5]  With these knowledge base supported by the public opinion of Eritreans enhanced through a mechanism of news outlets mass participations the government has already overcome the old thought of introducing multi political parties have been reviewed through the lessons-learned analysis: To determine what is offered to the Nation of Eritrea it has been explored under what is the benefit for the Nation and have been the main criteria to be considered for its implementation.  Now Eritrea has incorporated the following new idea problem solving strategy:

First, Eritrea has a full right to learn from past experiences of many African countries failures in trying to adopt into multi political party practices and recognize their mistakes and Eritrea was able to avoid the repetition of disastrous and corruptions outcomes which have been  occurring in Eritrea’s neighboring countries Ethiopia and Kenya.

Second, Eritrea’s new Management Lessons-Learned System has established for the purpose of  enhancing the peace and security of the country maintained first and it will continue adopting of new knowledge with best practices that can be tapped and assimilate within the Nation building development program and the operational procedures of Warsay-ykaalo projects.

However, Dr. Bereket and Andebrhan advocacies clutched onto their usual accusations toward the Eritrean governance and the fate of the detriment of 1997 constitution in order to advance their political agendas for regime change.  They provided no specific evidence for improvement proposal how to achieve a better governance in order to back their charges, and often omit or ignore vital facts of how much Eritrea progressed and become politically stable under the PFDJ leadership.  These adversaries who are so busy making money out of the blood of our martyrs, they can’t even see beyond the end of their noses.

Instead they chose to sing the song of “regime change railing cry without caring for a possible consequence of civil war for the destruction of the State of Eritrea.  They are following the evil tactic of Social Justice Ideology by misrepresenting Eritrea’s progress in every sector of the National Planned Objectives.  They are pushing for the formation of multi political parties to ensure a separation of powers between the ideal three branches within a government and other similar issues as have been reflected in many sections of the COI’s report including in the section of Conclusion and Recommendation. [6]

The question that was raised by the COI report: What is going to happen in regard to the 1997 constitution?  Eritrean Government has learned to avoid destructive objectives and keeping up with policy-goal of equal justice to all citizen men and women with no preferential treatment except for the disables, old people and children.  The detrimental constitution will be handled through public referendum voting practices in order to make it Null and Void before the newly drafted constitution available crafted by Eritreans for Eritreans through a constitution making  process.  Currently, all the legal codes are completed and followed International human rights guidance. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).  To “ensure any person whose rights or freedoms have recognized is violated shall have an effective remedy”. [7] The Due Process and Rule of Law finds its roots in the Civil Procedure Code of the State of Eritrea. Article 7 –Principles of Legality, Right to be heard.  Based on the size of Eritrea and the number of its population there is a proposal that the new constitution to be owned and amended by the Eritrean people only and it will be ready and enacted in 2018.

The detriment constitution beside its highly construed messages in every article has also legal constraint that it advocates for the complete separation of powers among the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches of government.  Therefore, the president will not have the power to examine the manner in which how the laws have been executed.

Now, the Eritrean Government is studying on two concepts of separation of powers within the government but has not figured to any great extent in the managing on complete separation of power, partial separation of power, overlap or no separation of powers.  The first (a) an extremely ancient concept, is the idea of procedure as a check and balance to the exercise of power. The belief that “due process” is an essential part of constitutional government is of great antiquity, and it runs parallel with ideas of mixed government and the separation of powers, but has relatively rarely been explicitly linked with those ideas and made an integral part of those theories.

The second (b) notion, a much more modern one, is the idea of process in government. This term, although used in different ways, indicates an awareness that government and politics do not consist in the automatic operation of formal procedures, but that there is a whole complex of activities around these procedures which determines the exact way in which they will be operated, sometimes in fact bringing about through the medium of the procedure exactly the reverse of what the procedure was intended to achieve.

The concern of forming political group without a complete study of the process of government with a theory of separation of power and legal institutions of government is dangerous unless the theory has anything to offer that must be able to cope with the complexities of politics as well as the structure of government. It is easy to say that the functions performed by the government are classified into three. Of course, most of them belong to the executive branch. For example, taking command of war and defense affairs, attending to deprived members of society, administering training, education, health and medical affairs pertain to executive power. In fact, judiciary engages only in rendering justice and the legislature in lawmaking. Attending to the needs of society are among the responsibilities of the executive.  But to make a bold statement by the COI in Eritrea that: there are a total lack of rule of law is absurd.  The idea of the separation of powers, perhaps the most important and problematic one and it is still remained the cause of the delay for the new constitution to be completed.  Constitution making is not like Sandwich making process but very delicate, complex and needs experience, knowledge, truthfulness and Nation Building Interest.

Separation of powers is a doctrine, which is the foundation of the U.S Constitution. .[8]  But in truth, however, the Constitution does not strictly adhere to the separation of powers, as the three branches of the government—Congress, the president, and the courts—have some overlap in their constitutionally assigned functions

Nevertheless, when all the necessary qualifications have been made, the essential ideas behind Edition: current; Page: the doctrine remain as vital ingredients of Western political thought that Eritrean Government can learn the practical aspect as practiced and benefited a sovereign country today. To substantiate this view it will be necessary to attempt to define and use terms in a more precise way than has been generally the case in the detriment constitution that the COI recommended it to be implemented.

The president has been demonized by enemies of Eritrea as far as they can go, attacking him that why the concentration of power is with him meaning in the executive office and running a government without a constitution.  While in realty Eritrea has not made a study on power separation and the president has been following up and down as well as micro managing means paying extreme attention to small details, following every step of the functionality of the government and he is fulfilling his obligation to do the best job for the people and nation of Eritrea.  Clearly the government has been administering the country with the rule of law that is why they have able to accomplish business agreements (mining, gas/oil, tourism and licensing for potash mining).   On the other hand since Constitution making is not a sand witch making process it is also the defining moment for the structure of the government and its responsibilities, as it is explained in chapter 3.2 Rule of Law.

The Eritrean Government expects the UNHRC/UNCOI to verify and substantiate all allegations against the Nation of Eritrea before presenting it publically.  Instead, the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)  forfeit their neutrality and are engaging themselves in a fraudulent/criminal activities against the Nation of Eritrea, when it knowingly accepts the unsubstantiated COI biased report that is a detriment to Eritrea’s sovereignty.

2.  The Obstacles of Democratic Governance

Eritrea is a newly independent nation, trying to adopt a dynamic Presidential democracy government system, located in the horn of Africa Red Sea Coast.  A very peaceful and beautiful country with its hard working none deviant pro family society but; because of the systemic and conjectural development have brought to the fore the need for continues defense of the country militarily due to the failure of the UN mission that lacks the maintenance of international peace and security.  The UN objective as the world knows is to keep the maintenance of international peace and security for all the member states.  In Eritrea’s case the Algiers agreement between Eritrea and Ethiopia [9] that was signed in the presence of UN member countries as guarantors for its implementations; has been completely ignored and it is far from its implementation.  This is a clear failure of the UN charter that Ethiopia was given preferential treatment by the USA through UN resolutions.

Now, Ethiopia has been allowed to exercise its adventurous military operation over the Eritrean sovereign legal right and its territorial integrity.  The outlawed Ethiopia was given free pass to occupy Eritrean land with no consequence even though the Boarder Commission on the contested land awarded to Eritrea.  Since then Eritrea has been living with no peace and no war situations, under a constant fear of war possibility and has been harassed by Ethiopia daily.

Additionally, Eritrea is continuously hindered by the two restrictive sanctions against them.

There also, asymmetric lawfare directed at its leaderships and its citizens by the Social Justice Activists under the cover of UNCOI.  Eritrea faces many challenges, including the need to balance sovereign rights and legal claims.  Eritrea is subjected to many disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks on its Nation Building efforts due to the fact that Eritrea believes in self sufficient in everything humanly possible as well as to uphold human rights by protecting its citizens from hunger, thickness, babies malnutrition for its citizens and educating its people in order to become productive and self sufficient to accomplish the objectives planned for the common good of the society.  At the sometime, the country has to defend against the on-going possibility of military strikes by Ethiopia due to the “No peace No war” resolution by the UN.

During these high time political pressures imposed on Eritrea, the COI/Social Justice Activists are falsely claiming to promote human rights and humanitarian objectives in Eritrea have led their illegal and unwarranted attacks as part of their campaigns.   These COI/ Social Justice Activists have developed a strategy to demonize Eritrea’s justice system or legal system based on the real enacted laws still they are  painting Eritrea as a rogue state. A key component of this approach involves portraying Eritrea as anti-democratic and lacking a legal system in rule of law and due process, painting a false picture surrounding the Eritrean enacted laws through proclamations.

Eritrea is fighting for its legal right to exist overcoming all types of attacks and that put it into a unique position where it is now.  However, Eritrea is not practicing the common law (Judge made decisional Law) where all the Executive orders have the full force of law when they take authority from a legislative power which grants its power directly to the Executive by the Constitution. While in Civil law where Eritrean law has been adopted, the violations are coded and released as (penal code, civil code, commercial code and maritime code), with brief text that tends to avoid factually specific scenarios.  The purpose of codification is to provide all citizens with manners and written collection of the laws which apply to them and which judges must follow. In this situation Eritrea has been practicing the codification law not Executive orders as the COI has falsely accused the government.

3. Eritrea’s Fundamental Sovereign Legal Rights

At this juncture, the Government of Eritrea is within its right to call for independent international investigations that must be formed by the member states of the UN as an ad hoc to address the issues of these lobbyists engaging in criminal activities against the Nation of Eritrea.   They have been attacking Eritrea with components of infringement against the Eritrean sovereignty through the UNCOI rapporteur association in order to cover up their devious activities.  All the Activists have been working through the UNCOI on Eritrea with selective enforcement tactics of Lawfare type to advance their criminality in order to punish or destroy Eritrea.  That is why the National Sovereignty for Eritrea is the paramount before anything else.  To defend the Nation of Eritrea now we must go after these organizations or individuals who work in conjunction with the COI who are attempting to erode the sovereignty of Eritrea in a fraudulent way.  Eritrea is accusing the UN for not respecting its fundamental purpose of the organization itself.  Indeed what the COI on Eritrea is doing is a violation of UN chapter 1, “purposes of the UN Article 2 (1) “The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members”.  Eritrea must have its sovereign right first, in order to fully earn its right to govern itself.

3.1 An example of attack on Eritrea’s sovereign legal right

First, the COI have violated the guidelines of the mandate that “the temporal scope of the investigation covers the period from the independence of Eritrea until present day.”

Then they have illegally and deliberately exposed the Eritrean National security paragraph 274 of the report beginning from the date of the Army struggle till 5 June 2015. [b] The disclosure of the National security of Eritrea as it was documented in the final report is of course unique to Eritrea only, I have read some Commission of Inquiry of other nations, but I have not observed the security of a nation exposed like Eritrea.  This is a deliberate attack on Eritrea’s capability and its limitation on its internal and external defense and a complete endangerment to its governing system for personnel and military confidentiality, which is normal and legal that every country must have.  The total disclosure of the security matters with dangerous statements on national security issues, means in accordance to the report it puts people’s life in total danger and the whole world will have doubt about Eritrea’s capability in matters of defense and security.

This is an example of the COI members, engaging in criminal activities.

Second, there are also new charges against all Eritreans in the Diaspora by the COI on human rights in Eritrea.  According to the final report, method of explanation, as documented and released that:  All Eritreans are “spies” on other Eritreans.  According to the COI characterization all Eritreans who are pro-government are capable of spying. [9] This is a threat to all Eritreans in the Diaspora: “that Eritreans who live in those western countries could be involved in spying on behalf of the Eritrean Government”. [10]

3.1 Violation of the Mandate

There is a violation of the COI written mandate  paragraph 10 of the report that: The Commission was only mandated to investigate all alleged violations of human rights in Eritrea, does not include the investigation of international crimes in Eritrea.  At best its interpretation is confusing deliberately done.

In accordance to the COI report released on Eritrea, it was recommended that Eritrea must immediately implement the discredited constitution of 1997.

3.2 Rule of Law

Currently, Eritrea is following Civil Law legal tradition, the adaption of those codes was infused with traditions and culture into the laws with an objective from the customary laws of Eritrea that was begun before the fifteenth century.  The traditional customary laws are the main guidance when writing those codes with the desire of modernization by attempting to infuse traditional practices value as the nation develops the codes will be updated as necessary a procedure set within the development of the Civil Law.  Eritrea as of 2015 has added and completed the codes and has accomplished and joined the standard of other Codified Countries with civil law that  have comprehensive system and will continuously updating the legal codes that specify all matters capable of being brought before a court; the applicable procedure, and the appropriate punishment for each offense. [11]   Eritrea, as the result of the set of modern codes will end the unwritten customary scattered rules and the beginning of the modern legislative framework of Eritrea.  This is the answer for Dr. Bereket and his cohorts including the COI who were badmouthing Eritrea as if the country is governing with no rule of law and sometimes they change the song into: What we mean, is with no constitution (QUAM).

However, for the sake of record, there are still countries with unwritten constitutions and are considered democratic.  These are: United Kingdom, Israel and even there is one country which has a codified set of several constitutional documents similar to the position where Eritrea is right now.   This country is San Marino. (Landlocked San Marino is one of the world’s smallest countries Surrounded by Italy).  The Government of Eritrea has updated:

Ø  Based on the legal codes Eritrea has, now it is fully participant within the codified countries.  However the government has officially announced that, they will deliver a written new constitution. The procedures for its approval and acceptance to be administered through a national referendum of voting by the Eritrean people on its acceptance and its enactment prior to delivery.   It will be delivered to the Eritrean people in 2018.

The above listed of demands by the COI are the partial list of recommendation in one hand and on the other hand it is the unjust demands indeed a part of the smear strategy that was been used during the establishment of their devious process aimed to capture world attention; by disseminating lies against the Nation of Eritrea to complete the fraudulent report full of unsubstantiated allegations against the innocence of the Eritrean Government.  This shameful COI report is known as:

Ø  Report of the detailed findings of the
commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea -­ A/HRC/29/CRP.1

(484 Pages) released on June 5, 2015

4. The Government of Eritrea and the Activists

The COI/Social Justice Activists have said it all their false allegations stated in the conclusion and recommendation section of the final report against the Nation of Eritrea.  Following the intensity of these false allegations, the Eritrean people convened more strongly than ever the need to stand together to oppose this detriment report through the management of lessons learned against the actions of the COI report which is to the detriment of Eritrea.  The Eritrean Government have developed knowledge, legally based that will hold accountable Ms. Sheila and her acompliances, Mr. Mike Smith and Mr. Dankwa how they have involved themselves in:

1.  Engaging in criminal activities

2.  Infringement against the Eritrean sovereignty

3   .Prepared a fraudulent report and submitted to the UN Commission of Human Rights         (UNCHR).

Many of the Activists roll have been documented that they have been the main architectures for supplying negative inputs during crafting each section of the report which has been intended to demonize and create chaos within the Government of Eritrea; so then they can infringe on Eritrea’s legal right by digging deep into a wide range of the Eritrean Government’s Ministries and heavily denigrated every part of the government; so then to facilitate the adoption of politically motivated propaganda for agitations aimed for civil unrest up to triggering civil war.

These are the wishes of the Eritrean informants who are working behind the COI manufactured lies against the Nation of Eritrea.  We Eritreans have deep insight into virtually every chapter of the report, how it has been developed, how the so called experts and consultants have formulated the plan in the campaign for destruction through a cover up of UN human rights issues advocated by the COI biased activism, in a maligning Eritrea as if it is “inherently rogue state” or a state of a Dictator ruling by fear instead of ruling by law.

Those so called experts, or consultants have misled the COI members with information of a total unsubstantiated data to complete the shameful report that was delivered to the UNHRC in Geneva on June 23, 2015.

All these activists with their combined forces have one common interest; all have received funding, training, and other support from an array of hostile foreign sources (including the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy) – many of which have been actively engaged in dozens of regime change operations in Europe and USA.

The COI who are themselves Social Justice Ideologically driven activists who must follow the strict code of deceit within the smear strategy to misinform the world that Eritrea is a belligerent country in the horn of Africa that harbors threats to neighbors.  They have been campaigning with these lies to confuse and influence the world with such characterizations for the past 15 years and have caused harm on Eritrea’s economic social and political programs.  For example they have been campaigning against the development of Eritrea with unethical tools as follows: (divestment and sanctions campaigns) that Eritrea is still enduring.  These immoral misleading initiatives are called lawfare not warfare aimed for regime change propaganda.

Ø  “Law fare” is a weapon designed to destroy the enemy by using, misusing, and abusing the legal system and the media in order to raise a public outcry against that enemy.

Ø  “Divestment “The process of selling an asset. Also known as divestiture, it is made for either financial or social goals. Divestment is the opposite of investment.

These are the Social Justice Activist tools that are available to destroy a negatively targeted nation. (Watch the video of “the fifth state dealing with a Dictator”, Nevsun Mining Co. in Eritrea).  Watch carefully, the biased Social Justice Activist named Mark Kelley how he tried to portray Eritrea by linking to terrorist organizations such as the Al Shebab. This is an example of Divestment.

This is clearly a biased Social Justice Activism; What Mark was implying that looks like a basic street tactics was actually he was following the strict rules or codes of demonization trying to create evidences by going and recording witnesses in order to have leverage for his task to continue.  However, since this person is ignorant about the law he has engaged into illegal activities by implying that Nevsun should not do business with Eritrea, at the same time he was engaging in to the detriment of the Nation of Eritrea.  He was  infringing on Eritrea’s sovereign rights by knowingly sabotaging business deals between Eritrea and Nevsun, that makes him liable and responsible to show up to court to answer legal obligations that is going to have brought back to him as to why he infringed on Eritrea’s sovereign rights in the first place.

Many of the organizations such as the NGOs who are Social Justice ideology crusaders are highly involved in the above noted strategy have received funding from the European Union International Organization, the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED, a de facto CIA a mechanism to topple a government where the regime is not 100% on Washington’s music page, comes from the US Congress), and George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

The smear strategy has encompassed Eritrea’s supposed Human Rights violation has been committed with no due process of the law or no form of legal judiciary system.  The Amnesty International (AI) Human Rights Watch are funded through NED and have been blindly providing negative information about Eritrea to the Commission of Inquiries from the data collected against Eritrea fraudulently and feeding the COI which Ms. Sheila was the employee of the AI herself in the first place.  This practice is wrong and illegal even if Sheila tried to change her color like a chameleon by adding two acompliances with her, she is still the main architecture identified by Eritreans with her inflammatory rhetoric against the state of Eritrea.  That puts her representation for UN and caused the UN image to look like the lowest of the lowest shameful practices when the UNHRC have let her to continue on this project.

4.1 Conspiracy against the Nation of Eritrea

In reality Ms. Sheila, become a prosecutor instead of human right rapporteur completely out of her mandate. The total intention of the provided information that was compiled by her with her acompliances and the consultations of the informants become the building blocks or the main framework of conspiracy and then created falsely many targeted objects by which to link to another objects aimed to paint the Government of Eritrea as a human rights violator, documented and delivered to the UNHRC in the 484 pages report.   The COI have released this shameful report to the whole world without any accountability for their crimes toward the Nation of Eritrea.  Another example of conspiracy is: The added accusations by the Amnesty International against the Eritrean Government are actually a direct copy of Mr. Connel from The Guardian speech in Washington D.C. May 2013. He instructed a group of Eritreans to campaign for regime change is possible when the focus is around the migrations and human trafficking and unlimited military conscriptions. He stated that: “It is easy to tie together with so many other issues, the unlimited conscriptions into national service, the trafficking issue, would build pressure on Isaias and weaken his ability to govern.” [12]

(See: https://redseafisher.wordpress.com/…/the-traffic-racket-the-eritrean-activi…

May 19, 2015 – by Connell from the Guardian).

4.2 Cases Challenges through legal judiciary process

Until now the courts around the world haven’t heard from Eritreans the law abiding people.  We are at high alert to claim our legal rights that needs challenges against anybody or organizations that attempts to infringe and deny us our basic rights within our communities.  The Social Justice Activists are driven through greed of money at the cost of the honor of our martyrs’ blood distributed through “None Profit Agencies”.  These low life activists are empowered to campaign for the destruction of the Nation of Eritrea through Social Justice Activists with no justification except the greed for money.

For example the three women from Europe who lacks National Eritrean morality supposedly  they are Eritreans who are fiercely working along with the social justice activists for the destruction of Eritrea have failed to adhere to moral and ethical standards in their own work: One is known by her crying for regime change in Eritrea for a long time (her method of crying is through her own mentally constructed fantasy who does not possibly know the horror of war that our people went through of heavy loss of lives for freedom).  She was born and grew in Ethiopia, never visited Eritrea even once and she become an activist to make money out of our martyrs blood; the second woman, (is heavily engaged in human trafficking for the purpose of Organ trafficking to make a lot of blood money along with the total extermination of our youth lives); the third women is also for regime change including for the destruction of Eritrea.  She is a (Quackery an ignorant pretender claimed to have a skill in diagnosing mental disorder of human being and she said in video interview: That her diagnosed result out of the signals coming to her brain, as she claimed that she was able to deduce with her false medical reasoning) “that president Isayas is a “paranoid, irrational, eccentric and reclusive”.  [13].   (This is the field to be left for people with degrees in M.D., Ph.D., in a medical, behavioral or social science field; and registered with a reputable organization that oversees psychiatric or psychological testing and diagnostic procedures with many years of professional experience).

The real reasons why these activists wants the Nation of Eritrea to be dissolved so that once it is dissolved their past criminal activities can also be dissolved or evaporated with it.  In this way they can always start fresh their criminal activities again.  These women have been engaged in crimes and based on the severity of their crimes; it is going to haunts them for years to come.

We Eritreans will start confronting enemies of the Nation of Eritrea by filing lawsuits against any perpetrators who harmed us in violation of the law such as slanders and threats toward us and to the Nation of Eritrea.  For example, we are watching the evil intentions of the COI/Social Justice Activists toward Eritrea that they are charging Eritrea continuously as human rights violator a pretext for attempting to “topple the government that would result in the destruction of our country like Iraqi, Libya, Syria or Yemen”.

Recently, those Social Justice Activists including the (NGOs) demonizing strategies have unleashed against an Eritrean citizen, attacking him his personal integrity by violating his legal rights ended up in lawsuits through the court of Netherland known the case of: Meseret Bahlbi versus Prof. Miriam van Reisen in Netherland.  Mr.Meseret finally he ended up winning this case by putting doubt about Miriam Van Reisen reputation which will affect her that she will be known having been sued previously for defamation and slandering an Eritrean/Dutch citizen including the preservation of respect to all Eritrean community.  In this case even if he loses in the court he won in the court of public opinion by placing a permanent legal record that Miriam van Reisen was involved in giving out slanderous talk against Eritreans.  This will be one of the merits that will deny her future employment in the academia world for infringing Eritreans legal rights.  Now any public office that she tries to obtain is ruined

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have joined efforts under the name of COI/NGOs or known by their true identity called Social Justice Activists have made allegations against all Eritreans in the Diaspora in particular, those who support the Government of Eritrea that we are all spies. This is the typical infringement on our legal right that we continue to put up with.  This will open for more litigation including toward the COI on Eritrea.  Our focus now is on the COI who have clearly violated every Eritrean rights living abroad with their fraudulent report in the (484 Pages) released on June 5, 2015.  We have legal rights that will not be infringed upon.

While the COI report discussed and alleged that Eritrea fails to uphold the legal judiciary process, the COI members they themselves did not follow the rules of UNHRC method of gathering relevant data and engaged in criminal activities, infringed against the Eritrean sovereign legal rights and prepared a fraudulent report and submitted to the UNHRC. This is a high failure on the COI immoral frameworks under which many organizations in support to the COI operate.  The COI in particular Sheila is not up to Eritrea’s none-bias reporting standard when they write statements like this below:

(a) “Following up on practices developed during the liberation struggle, the PFDJ, the ruling and only party in Eritrea, has held on to power by progressively dismantling or refraining from implementing reforms aimed at establishing democracy and rule of law in the country”.[14]

(b) “Paragraph 272. From 1994, through the border war with Ethiopia and then particularly since the events of 2001, the significance of the PFDJ has consistently shrunk – to the point that some observers now consider it to have become an empty shell”.

The above inflammatory statement does not meet Eritrea’s none-bias reporting standard and this is in violation of her mandate she is engaging in inciting violence instead of engaging in advocacy and raise public awareness; and provide advice for technical cooperation.

This is a typical Social Justice Allegation completely unsubstantiated form of agitation a premeditated oral and written statement for inciting violence in Eritrea.  This lady being a member of the COI is not following her mandate, but she is engaging in fraudulent activities.  She has lost her credibility, because of the fraudulent report she submitted and the Nation of Eritrea will no longer be dealing with her at any capacity what so ever.

To all UN member states please review the conduct of the three COI members in particular Sheila.  She must be relieved from her assignment that she is a complete disservice and shame to the whole world.  Eritrea cannot allow the COI members coming to Eritrea, because they are engaged in open fraudulent activism against the Nation of Eritrea.  They must demonstrate to the Nation of Eritrea none bias, ethically acceptable with objectivity and denounce the released report of 484 pages completely filled with unsubstantiated fraudulent statements, Eritrea is well within its sovereign right to deny the COI entry visa to visit Eritrea.  Even by any miracle these COI members could set a foot on Eritrea’s land, because of the fraudulent report prepared driven by the anti Eritrea groups and released, I will not doubt that this will create a backlash within the Eritrean masses and it will be big public safety liability to the Eritrean Government toward their safety around the clock.

5. Conclusion

Eritreans in the Diaspora are requesting the Human Rights Council UNHRC to disclose the motivation letter that sheila submitted with her application, why she selected the State of Eritrea to work as a rapportuer.  Her Nomination, Selection and Appointment to become a mandate holder for Eritrea are a point of contention.  In accordance to Resolution 16/21 states that: the selection practices must have been made with transparency within the selection and appointment process.  In tandem with selection process, the National Human Rights Institutions that comply with the Paris Principles may also nominate candidates.   However the most interesting point in these practices is candidates are required to submit an application accompanied by a motivation letter before they got interviewed by the Consultative Group.

Additionally, in accordance to resolution 5/1, the following general criteria were also applied for all mandate holders: (a) expertise; (b) experience in the field of the mandate; (c) independence; (d) impartiality; (e) personal integrity; and (f) objectivity.

The COI rapporteur on Eritrea, Sheila in particular, has not demonstrated any of the above listed criteria and she made it quite clear that she wants to hear from supposed Eritrean people who are only against the government of the Nation of Eritrea.  The lack of impartiality, independence, personal integrity, objectivity and a questionable expertise are all reflected in her fraudulent 484 pages of June 2015 report about Eritrea Human Rights violations submitted to the UNHRC.  Therefore, this gross incompetency on her part should have been the bases for her disqualifications, at any rate,  Sheila fall short of being a competent rapportour.

She is in violation of the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council that, she must be independent human rights experts with mandates to report and advice on human rights from a thematic or country-specific perspective.  The Special Procedure of the Human Rights clearly states that: “A rapporteur must demonstrate expert consultations, contributing to the development of international human rights standards; engage in advocacy and raise public awareness; and provide advice for technical cooperation”.  By writing one sentence that Eritrea can ask for technical assistance in the conclusion of the report after she condemned Eritrea with the highest criminal language will not help her to cover up her crime that she inflicted damage on the State of Eritrea.

FOOTNOTES

[1] Wiki Leaks, Raimoq.com:Feb.24, 2016 Exposes that Sanctions Imposed against Eritrea are politically

[2] Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea – A/HRC/29/42 … Press Release: UN Inquiry reports gross human rights violations in Eritrea Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea – A/HRC/29/42 … Eritrea June 5, 2015

[3] UN Vladimir Safronkov, Feb. 12, 2016, said: “UNITED NATIONS (Sputnik) — some members of the UN Security Council misuse sanctions, acting as if they are entitled to control certain countries and entire regions of the world

[4] Paragraph 270. On Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea, “Since its creation in February 1994, the PFDJ has remained the only political organization allowed in Eritrea”.

[5] Lessons Learned | NASA Chief Knowledge Officer

km.nasa.gov/lessons-learned/

Lessons Learned Information System (LLIS) (NASA Only) The primary Lesson Learned Database of NASA, which sits behind a firewall in the NASA … and project managers in improving work processes and making risk-informed decisions.

[6] Paragraph 270. On Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea, “Since its creation in February 1994, the PFDJ has remained the only political organization allowed in Eritrea”.

[7] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights …

https://en.wikipedia.org/…/International_Covenant_on_Civil_a…

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 16 December 1966

[8] Separation of Powers – Legal Dictionary – The Free Dictionary

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/separation+of+powers

Definition of separation of powers in the Legal Dictionary –

[9] Paragraph 340 – 368, Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea, On Report:  The system for mass surveillance and control of the population.

[10] Id at Para 340-368

[11] Penal Code of Eritrea – Refworld

www.refworld.org/pdfid/55a51ccc4.pdf Art. 7. – Principles of Legality.

 

[12] (See: https://redseafisher.wordpress.com/…/the-traffic-racket-the-eritrean-active…

May 19, 2015 – by Connell from the Guardian).

 

[13] www.opendemocracy.net/…/isaias-afewerki-and-Eritrea-…

Open Democracy Jun 24, 2009 – Selam Kidane

 

[14] Paragraph 270-272 The role of the People’s Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ), Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in Eritrea.