http://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/iran-controlled-yemen-rebels-eye-700bn-worth-maritime-trade-route/297282
14 October 2016 International Opinion
Iran-Controlled Yemen Rebels Eye $700Bn-Worth Maritime Trade Route
Houthis targeting US ships should be read as an attempt to blackmail
international players
Shajahan Madampat
Seventeen months ago, this writer saw it coming. On Thursday, the US
military launched cruise missile strikes to take out three coastal
radar sites belonging to the Houthi militias around Bab Al Mandab
(Gateway of Tears), a vitally important maritime artery and energy
pathway off war-torn Yemen's southern coast.
The US retaliation, authorised by President Barack Obama, came quick
on the heels of the Houthis targeting American warships in an act of
reckless adventurism.
On Wednesday, October 12, a US Navy destroyer was targeted in a failed
missile attack north of the Bab al-Mandab strait. Another US Navy
destroyer was targeted on Sunday, October 9.
The missiles were fired from territory in Yemen controlled by the
Iran-aligned Houthi militias. The Pentagon confirmed that the Houthis
were indeed behind the failed attacks.
A week before that, on October 1, a United Arab Emirates ship was hit
by missiles around the same area in the Strait as it approached the
coast of Mokha on the Red Sea. According to reports, the Houthis said
they used a Chinese-designed, C-802 anti-ship missile system for the
attack.
It is clear that Iran had supplied the missiles to the Houthis. Iran
had bought C-802 missiles from China and manufactured its own variant,
the Noor. Moreover, it is not the first time that Iran supplied these
missiles to armed militias. During the Second Lebanon War in 2006,
several reports appeared saying that Hezbollah had used C-802
anti-ship missiles. To say that Iran had supplied C -802 to Hezbollah
would be stating the obvious. Supply of such arms to the Houthis is a
clear violation of the United Nations arms embargo.
More importantly, the three attacks point to a grave danger facing
international maritime trade on the one hand and a serious escalation
and expansion of the conflict on the other, which already claimed the
lives of over 10000 people.
The attacks reflect a new strategic focus on the part of the
Houthi-Saleh militias on maritime-based control. This strategy has two
components: First, it is clearly aimed at creating parity with the
internationally recognised government of Yemen's President Abdu Rabbu
Mansour Hadi. Second, control over Bab Al Mandab can give them the
power to blackmail the international system and bring wider attention
to the conflict.
Bab Al Mandab offers the shortest trade routes between the
Mediterranean (Europe and North Africa) and the Indian Ocean and
beyond (India, China, and East Asia). Nearly all of the maritime trade
between Europe and Asia worth a whopping $700 billion a year passes
through the Bab al-Mandab straits on the southern entrance to the Red
Sea, en route to the Suez Canal.
It is a critical location for world trade and any disruption to
commercial shipping, particularly the transport of oil, through the
Red Sea and the Suez Canal will spell disaster.
The alternative options in case of a disruption are bleak. The
East-West pipeline will be hardly equal to the challenge, forcing a
circuitous and immensely costly voyage around the Cape of Good Hope.
If the international community does not take timely action to preempt
and thwart further adventures around the strait, the situation can get
out of control. The Houthis, covertly or overtly supported by Iran,
have the military wherewithal to throw world trade into chaos by
blocking the strait through the deployment of sea mines, harassment
and interdiction by small patrol craft, and attacks by a variety of
weapon systems.
Iran, the main patron of the Houthis, is not new to such lethal games
of disruption and destabilization.
Iranian threats to pulverize international trade by blocking the
Strait of Hormuz are well-known. The war between Iran and Iraq in the
1980s was the first occasion the world woke up to the prospect of a
potential Iran-engineered disruption in maritime trade routes.
Merchant ships from countries considered hostile were regularly
harassed and assaulted by the Iranians. In 2008 the Commander of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps boasted that “closing the Strait of
Hormuz for an unlimited period of time would be very easy.” In 2012,
Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz if the sanctions against
Iran for its nuclear program were not lifted.
The straits of Hormuz and Bab Al Mandab, accounting for 18% and 4% of
the world's trade in oil respectively in addition to the
transportation of various other goods, is perilously close to becoming
the pivotal points around which a wider military confrontation of
global proportions may happen. In other words, if the conflict in the
poorest Arab country is not resolved, Iran may be in a position to
derail 22% of the world's oil trade, inviting deterrent and
retaliatory action from the US and other Western powers in tandem with
their regional allies.
The situation is quite serious and can have disastrous consequences
not just for the Middle East and North Africa region, but to the rest
of the world as well. The way in which Iran expanded its sphere of
influence through armed proxies over the past decade and the measures
initiated by Saudi Arabia and its allies to counter it are the
immediate regional backdrop for the current developments. But it goes
well beyond that. The Middle East is slowly turning into a
battleground of egos between the US and Russia as well.
Legend has it that Bab-el-Mandeb was created by tectonic movements
along three fault lines. It is indeed tectonic developments of a
political and military nature that are unfolding right now around the
Strait. The question is: Will it further escalate into a wider
conflict or prompt world powers to come together to quicken the
process of political settlement?
________________________________
Shajahan Madampat is a writer and cultural critic.
Received on Fri Oct 14 2016 - 20:45:27 EDT