From: wolda002@umn.edu
Date: Tue Apr 06 2010 - 21:01:31 EDT
AFRICOM’s First War: U.S. Directs Large-Scale Offensive In Somalia
March 11, 2010
AFRICOM’s First War: U.S. Directs Large-Scale Offensive In Somalia
Rick Rozoff
Over 43 people have been killed in the Somali capital of Mogadishu in two 
days of fighting between Shabab (al-Shabaab) insurgent forces, who on March 
10 advanced to within one mile of the nation’s presidential palace, and 
troops of the U.S.-backed Transitional Federal Government. The fighting has 
just begun.
The last ambassador of the United States to Somalia (1994-1995), Daniel H. 
Simpson, penned a column for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on March 10 in 
which which he posed the question “why, apart from the only lightly 
documented charge of Islamic extremism among the Shabab, is the United 
States reengaging in Somalia at this time?”
He answered it in stating “Part of the reason is because the United 
States has its only base in Africa up the coast from Mogadishu, in 
Djibouti, the former French Somaliland. The U.S. Africa Command was 
established there in 2008, and, absent the willingness of other African 
countries to host it, the base in Djibouti became the headquarters for U.S. 
troops and fighter bombers in Africa.
“Flush with money, in spite of the expensive wars in Iraq and 
Afghanistan, the Department of Defense obviously feels itself in a position 
to undertake military action in Africa, in Somalia.” [1]
Fulfilling its appointed role, the New York Times leaked U.S. military 
plans for the current offensive in Somalia on March 5 in a report titled 
“U.S. Aiding Somalia in Its Plan to Retake Its Capital.” (Note that the 
Transitional Federal Government is presented as Somalia itself and 
Mogadishu as its capital.)
The tone of the feature was of course one of approval and endorsement of 
the Pentagon’s rationale for directly intervening in Somalia at a level 
not seen since 1993 and support for proxy actions last witnessed with the 
invasion by Ethiopia in 2006. The report began with a description of a 
military surveillance plane circling over the Somali capital and a quote 
from the new chief of staff of the nation’s armed forces, General Mohamed 
Gelle Kahiye: “It’s the Americans. They’re helping us.”
Afterward “An American official in Washington, who said he was not 
authorized to speak publicly” – a hallmark of the American free press 
– was, if not identified, quoted as maintaining that U.S. covert 
operations were planned if not already underway and “What you’re likely 
to see is airstrikes and Special Ops moving in, hitting and getting out.” 
[2]
The New York Times also provided background information regarding the 
current offensive:
“Over the past several months, American advisers have helped supervise 
the training of the Somali forces to be deployed in the offensive….The 
Americans have provided covert training to Somali intelligence officers, 
logistical support to the peacekeepers, fuel for the maneuvers, 
surveillance information about insurgent positions and money for bullets 
and guns.” [3]
Four days later General William (“Kip”) Ward, commander of United 
States Africa Command (AFRICOM), testified before the Senate Armed Services 
Committee.
In his introductory remarks the chairman of the committee, Senator Carl 
Levin, reinforced recent American attempts to expand the scope of the 
deepening Afghanistan-Pakistan war, the deadliest and lengthiest in the 
world, to the west and south in stating that “al Qaeda and violent 
extremists who share their ideology are not just located in the 
Afghanistan-Pakistan region but in places like Somalia, Mali, Nigeria and 
Niger.” [4]
In his formal report Ward pursued a similar tact and expanded the 
Pentagon’s “counter-terrorism” (CT) area of responsibility yet 
further from South Asia: “U.S. Africa Command has focused the majority of 
its CT capacity building activities in East Africa on Kenya, Ethiopia, 
Djibouti, and Uganda, which – aside from Somalia – are the countries 
directly threatened by terrorists.” [5]
He also spoke of the current offensive by “the transition government to 
reclaim parts of Mogadishu,” stating “I think it’s something that we 
would look to do and support.” [6]
Senator Levin and General Ward included eight African nations in the 
broader Afghan war category of Operation Enduring Freedom, countries from 
the far northeast of the continent (the Horn of Africa) to the far west 
(the oil-rich Gulf of Guinea). The U.S. military has already been involved 
in counterinsurgency operations in Mali and Niger against ethnic Tuareg 
rebels, who have no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda, not that one would know 
that from Levin’s comments.
In between South Asia and Africa lies Yemen on the Arabian Peninsula. The 
New York Times report cited earlier reminded readers that “The United 
States is increasingly concerned about the link between Somalia and 
Yemen.” Indeed as Levin’s comments quoted above establish, Washington 
(along with its NATO allies) is forging an expanded war front from 
Afghanistan and Pakistan to Yemen and into Africa. [7]
That extension of the South Asia war has not gone unobserved in world 
capitals, and earlier this year Russian political analyst Andrei Fedyashin 
commented: “Adding up all four fronts – if the United States ventured 
an attack on Yemen and Somalia – America would have to invade a territory 
equal to three-fourths of Western Europe; and it is hardly strong enough 
for that.” [8]
Strong enough or not, that is just what the White House and the Pentagon 
are doing. The only other objection that can be raised to the above 
author’s description is that it too severely narrows the intended 
battlefront.
In the past six months Somali troops have been sent to Djibouti, Ethiopia, 
Kenya and Uganda for combat training and “most are now back in the 
capital, waiting to fight.”
In addition, “There are also about 5,000 Ugandan and Burundian 
peacekeepers, with 1,700 more on their way, and they are expected to play a 
vital role in backing up advancing Somali forces.” [9]
Last October the U.S. led ten days of military exercises in Uganda – 
Natural Fire 10 – with 450 American troops and over 550 from Burundi, 
Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. The U.S. soldiers were deployed from 
Camp Lemonier (Lemonnier) in Djibouti, home to the Pentagon’s Joint Task 
Force/Horn of Africa and over 2,000 U.S. forces. The de facto headquarters 
of AFRICOM.
At the time of the maneuvers a major Ugandan newspaper wrote that they were 
“geared towards the formation of the first Joint East African Military 
Force.” [10]
In addition to using such a multinational regional force in Somalia, the 
U.S. can also deploy it against Uganda’s Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) 
rebels in Uganda, Congo and Sudan, and could even employ it against 
Eritrea, Zimbabwe and Sudan, the only nations on the African continent not 
to some degree enmeshed in military partnerships with Washington and NATO. 
(Libya has participated in NATO naval exercises and South Africa has hosted 
the bloc’s warships.) [11]
Earlier this month the Kenyan newspaper The East African divulged that 
“American legislators are pushing for a law that will see another phase 
of military action to apprehend Lord’s Resistance Army rebels.”
The news source added that the LRA Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery 
Bill adopted by the U.S. Congress last year “requires the US government 
to develop a new multifaceted strategy” and as such the new bill under 
consideration “will not be the first time the US government is providing 
support to the Uganda army in fighting the LRA.
“The US has been backing the UPDF [Uganda People's Defence Force] with 
logistics and training to fight the rebel group.” [12]
Last month it was announced that the U.S. Africa Command has dispatched 
special forces to train 1,000 Congolese troops in the north and east of 
their nation, where Congo borders Uganda.
Former U.S. diplomat Daniel Simpson was quoted above as to what in part is 
Washington’s motive in pursuing a new war in and around Somalia: To test 
out AFRICOM ground and air forces in Djibouti for direct military action on 
the continent.
A United Press International report of March 10, placed under energy news, 
offered another explanation. In a feature titled “East Africa is next hot 
oil zone,” the news agency disclosed that “East Africa is emerging as 
the next oil boom following a big strike in Uganda’s Lake Albert Basin. 
Other oil and natural gas reserves have been found in Tanzania and 
Mozambique and exploration is under way in Ethiopia and even war-torn 
Somalia.”
The region is, in the words of the Western chief executive officer of an 
oil prospecting firm, “the last real high-potential area in the world 
that hasn’t been fully explored.” [13]
The article added: “The discovery at Lake Albert, in the center of Africa 
between Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, is estimated to 
contain the equivalent of several billion barrels of oil. It is likely to 
be the biggest onshore field found south of the Sahara Desert in two 
decades.”
It also spoke of “a vast 135,000-square-mile territory in landlocked 
Ethiopia that is believed to contain sizable reserves of oil. It is 
estimated to hold 4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas as well.”
And, more pertinent to the Horn of Africa: 
“A 1993 study by Petroconsultants of Geneva concluded that Somalia has 
two of the most potentially interesting hydrocarbon-yielding basins in the 
entire region – one in the central Mudugh region, the other in the Gulf 
of Aden. More recent analyses indicate that Somalia could have reserves of 
up to 10 billion barrels.” [14]
Washington’s North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies are also deeply 
involved in the militarization of East Africa.
On March 10 NATO extended its naval operation in the Gulf of Aden off the 
coast of Somalia, Ocean Shield, to the end of 2012, an unprecedentedly long 
33-month extension. On March 12 “Standing NATO Maritime Group 2 will take 
over missions from Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 for the four-month 
assignment. The change will increase NATO’s contribution from four ships 
to five ships….” [15]
At the same hearings of the Senate Armed Services Committee that AFRICOM 
commander William Ward addressed, NATO Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, 
America’s Admiral James Stavridis, “noted that 100,000 NATO troops are 
involved in expeditionary operations on three continents, including 
operations in Afghanistan, off the coast of Africa, and in Bosnia.” 
(Evidently Kosovo was meant for Bosnia.)
Stavridis, who is concurrently top military chief of U.S. European Command, 
said “The nature of threats in this 21st century [is] going to demand 
more than just sitting behind our borders.” [16]
He also said he finds “Iran alarming in any number of dimensions,” 
specifically mentioning alleged “state-sponsored terrorism, nuclear 
proliferation and political outreach into Latin America.” [17]
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen recently returned from Jordan 
and the Persian Gulf state of Bahrain where he pressured both nations to 
support the war in Afghanistan and Alliance naval operations.
“NATO’s top official said [on March 9] that he has asked Jordan and 
Bahrain to contribute to alliance naval operations fighting terrorism and 
piracy in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Gulf of Aden, as he ended a 
visit to the two countries. NATO is keen to improve cooperation with Arab 
and Muslim states, seeing them as important allies for a number of 
missions, including the all-important deployment in Afghanistan.” [18]
Regarding the Western military bloc’s almost nine-year Operation Active 
Endeavor in the entire Mediterranean Sea and its Operation Ocean Shield in 
the Gulf of Aden, Rasmussen said, “We would very much like to strengthen 
cooperation (with Bahrain and Jordan) within these operations.” [19]
While in Jordan he was strengthening military ties with NATO’s 
Mediterranean Dialogue partnership – Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, 
Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia – and in Bahrain firming up the Istanbul 
Cooperation Initiative aimed at the six members of the Gulf Cooperation 
Council: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab 
Emirates.
Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have military personnel 
serving under NATO in Afghanistan.
In late February a delegation of the 53-nation African Union (AU) visited 
NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe in Mons, Belgium.
“NATO continues to support the AU mission in Somalia (AMISOM) through the 
provision of strategic sea- and air-lift for AMISOM Troop Contributing 
Nations on request. The last airlift support occurred in June 2008 when 
NATO transported a battalion of Burundian peacekeepers to Mogadishu.” 
[20]
On March 10 AMISON deployed tanks to prevent the capture of the Somali 
presidential palace by rebels.
The North Atlantic military bloc, which in recent years has conducted 
large-scale exercises in West Africa and inaugurated its international 
Response Force in Cape Verde in 2006, also supports “the 
operationalisation of the African Standby Force – the African Union’s 
vision for a continental, on-call security apparatus similar to the NATO 
Response Force.” [21]
In May the European Union, whose membership largely overlaps with that of 
NATO and which is engaged in intense integration with the military bloc on 
a global scale [22], will begin training 2,000 Somali troops in Uganda.
Brigadier General Thierry Caspar-Fille-Lambie, commanding officer of French 
armed forces in Djibouti, said “the Somali troops will be trained with 
the necessary military skills to help pacify and stabilize the volatile 
country.”
He issued that statement “at the closing ceremony of four-week French 
operational training of 1,700 Ugandan troops to be deployed” to Somalia 
in May. The French ambassador to Uganda said “The EU troops shall work in 
close collaboration with UPDF to train Somali troops.” [23]
The 2,000 soldiers to be trained by the EU will represent a full third of a 
projected 6,000-troop Somali army.
The U.S.-NATO-EU global triad plans an even larger collective military role 
in the new scramble for Africa. On March 4 and 5 a delegation from AFRICOM 
met with European Union officials in Brussels “seeking EU cooperation in 
Africa,” specifically in “areas where cooperation could be possible, 
notably with the soon-to-be-launched EU mission to train Somali troops.” 
[24]
Tony Holmes, AFRICOM’s deputy to the commander for civil-military 
activities, said “Somalia, that’s an area where we’re going to be 
doing a lot more, the European Union is already doing a lot and will be 
doing more….
“Somalia is very important for us. The European Union is involved in 
training Somalis in Uganda and that’s something we might be able to work 
closely with to support.”
The AFRICOM delegation, including Major-General Richard Sherlock, director 
of strategy, plans and programs, also discussed “counter-terrorism 
cooperation with the EU in the Sahel region, notably in Mauritania, Mali 
and Niger….” [25]
In late January the chairman of NATO’s Military Committee, Admiral 
Giampaolo Di Paola, said “that the Alliance is in discussion with a Gulf 
state to deploy AWACS planes for a reconnaissance mission over Afghanistan 
in support of its ISAF mission and also for anti-piracy off Somalia.” 
[24]
To demonstrate that NATO’s anti-piracy operation off the coast of Somalia 
has other designs than the one acknowledged, early this year a NATO 
spokesman announced that the bloc’s naval contingent in the Gulf of Aden 
“now has an additional task” to intervene against a fictional 
deployment of Somali fighters across the Gulf to Yemen.
The spokesman, Jacqui Sheriff, said “NATO warships will be on the lookout 
for anything suspicious.” [25]
As though Somali al-Shabaab fighters have nothing else to do as the U.S. is 
engineering an all-out assault on them in their homeland.
Five days after the New York Times feature detailed American war plans in 
Somalia, the Washington Times followed up on and added to that report.
U.S. operations are “likely to be the most overt demonstration of U.S. 
military backing since the ill-fated Operation Restore Hope of 1992….”
“Unmanned U.S. surveillance aircraft have been seen circling over 
Mogadishu in recent days, apparently pinpointing insurgent positions as the 
TFG [Transitional Federal Government] marshals its forces. U.S. Army 
advisers have been helping train the TFG’s forces, which have been 
largely equipped with millions of dollars’ worth of U.S. arms airlifted 
into Mogadishu over the last few weeks.”
The newspaper report further stated: “It’s not clear when the offensive 
will start. The word on the street is sometime in the next few weeks….”
The campaign has already begun.
“After securing Mogadishu, the offensive, supported by militias allied 
with the government, for now, at least, is likely to continue against 
al-Shebab in the countryside west and south toward the border with 
Kenya.” [26]
After the capital, the entire country. After Somalia, the region.
The war has just begun. 
1) Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, March 10, 2010
2) New York Times, March 5, 2010
3) Ibid
4) Senate Armed Forces Committee, March 9, 2010
5) United States Africa Command, March 9, 2010
6) Senate Armed Forces Committee, March 9, 2010
7) U.S., NATO Expand Afghan War To Horn Of Africa And Indian Ocean
Stop NATO, January 8, 2010
Yemen: Pentagon’s War On The Arabian Peninsula
Stop NATO, December 15, 2009
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/yemen-pentagons-war-on-the-arabian-peninsula
8) Russian Information Agency Novosti, January 11, 2010
9) New York Times, March 5, 2010
10) The Monitor, October 14, 2009
11) AFRICOM Year Two: Seizing The Helm Of The Entire World
Stop NATO, October 22, 2009
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/africom-year-two-taking-the-helm-of-the-entire-world
12) The East African, March 1, 2010
13) United Press International, March 10, 2010
14) Ibid
15) Stars and Stripes, March 11, 2010
16) United States Department of Defense, March 9, 2010
17) Ibid
18) Deutsche Presse-Agentur, March 9, 2010
19) Ibid
20) North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe
February 24, 2010
21) Ibid
22) EU, NATO, US: 21st Century Alliance For Global Domination
Stop NATO, February 19, 2009
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/eu-nato-us-21st-century-alliance-for-global-domination
23) Xinhua News Agency, February 13, 2010
24) Europolitics, March 5, 2010
25) Ibid
26) Kuwait News Agency, January 28, 2010
27) Canwest News Service, January 1, 2010
28) Washington Times, March 10, 2010 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
US and NATO Expand Afghan War To The Horn Of Africa And Indian Ocean
         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----