| Jan-Mar 09 | Apr-Jun 09 | Jul-Sept 09 | Oct-Dec 09 | Jan-May 10 | Jun-Dec 10 | Jan-May 11 | Jun-Dec 11 |

[dehai-news] Innercitypress.com: At UN on Eritrea, Discordant NYT Note in Arming Shabab Narrative Ignored

From: Berhane Habtemariam <Berhane.Habtemariam_at_gmx.de_at_dehai.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:18:17 +0200

At UN on Eritrea, Discordant NYT Note in Arming Shabab Narrative Ignored

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 29, 2012 -- After the Somalia / Eritrea Sanctions
Committee of the UN Security Council provided a closed door briefing on
Wednesday, Inner City Press asked Deputy Permanent Representative Philip
Parham of the UK, this month's Council president, about it:

Inner City Press: There had been this controversy about a flight where
Eritrea had been accused of bringing, flying in weapons to Al-Shabaab. There
were media accounts that the report of the Committee cleared them of that,
or said there was no evidence of that. Has this now finally, has this
reached the Council, was this discussed at all?

Amb Parham: Yes. The role of Eritrea was discussed in the consultations we
have had just now. The Monitoring Group say that they have established that
Eritrea has been breaching the arms embargo. That's clearly a serious issue
and I think the Committee, chaired by Ambassador Puri, will take that
forward, among other things, I think, in discussion with the Eritreans
themselves."

Inner City Press: There was a New York Times report saying actually that the
Committee had found a particular flight that was used as a rationale for
entering Somalia didn
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/world/africa/eritrea-panel-finds-no-arms-
were-sent-to-somali-rebels.html> 't take place. Was the presentation
uniformly --

Amb Parham: In the discussion just now we didn't get into the specific
flights, but what we did hear is that the Monitoring Group have established
that there have been breaches by Eritrea and that is something which, I
think, the Committee will take forward including, as I say, with the
Eritreans themselves. Thanks.

  Just on this issue, Reuters on January 16, 2012 reported and the New York
Times of January 17, 2012 at Page A10 published as followed:
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/world/africa/eritrea-panel-finds-no-arms-
were-sent-to-somali-rebels.html>

Eritrea: Panel Finds No Arms Were Sent to Somali Rebels

By REUTERS

Published: January 16, 2012

Eritrea did not airlift arms to Islamist militants in the Somali town of
Baidoa late last year, a preliminary United Nations report has found. Kenya
accused Eritrea in November of delivering weapons to the Shabab, a
Qaeda-linked rebel group battling to overthrow Somalia's Western-backed
government. Eritrea repeatedly denied the accusation. The United Nations
Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea said that its 'preliminary
assessment is that these reports were incorrect and that the alleged
deliveries to Baidoa probably did not take place.'

  Was this Reuters and NYT report
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/world/africa/eritrea-panel-finds-no-arms-
were-sent-to-somali-rebels.html> false? No correction was ever published.
If not, how could the Committee not discuss it, but rather hear only that
"the Monitoring Group say that they have established that Eritrea has been
breaching the arms embargo"?

Perhaps relatedly, how can it be that after Ethiopia admitted attacked
inside Eritrea, which wrote to the Council as first reported by Inner City
Press, the Council has held no meeting or discussion, until the above
summarized sanctions discussion?

One thought that UN and even Security Council was about hearing from those
accused, and about dialogue. But perhaps not. Watch this site.

 




         ----[Mailing List for Eritrea Related News ]----
Received on Thu Mar 29 2012 - 12:38:45 EDT
Dehai Admin
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2012
All rights reserved