From: Tsegai Emmanuel (emmanuelt40@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 04 2009 - 13:07:17 EDT
Published on Saturday, July 4, 2009 by The Guardian/UK
Fears for the World's Poor Countries as the Rich Grab Land to Grow Food
• UN sounds warning after 30m hectares bought up • G8 leaders to discuss
'neo-colonialism'
by John Vidal
The acquisition of farmland from the world's poor by rich countries and
international corporations is accelerating at an alarming rate, with an area
half the size of Europe's farmland targeted in the last six months, reports
from UN officials and agriculture experts say.
[image: [Farms in Kenya have been subcontracted for foreign produce.
Photograph: Tony Karumba/AFP/Getty]]Farms in Kenya have been subcontracted
for foreign produce. Photograph: Tony Karumba/AFP/Getty
New reports from the UN and analysts in India, Washington and London
estimate that at least 30m hectares is being acquired to grow food for
countries such as China and the Gulf states who cannot produce enough for
their populations. According to the UN, the trend is accelerating and could
severely impair the ability of poor countries to feed themselves.
Today it emerged that world leaders are to discuss what is being described
as "land grabbing" or "neo-colonialism" at the G8 meeting next week. A
spokesman for Japan's ministry of foreign affairs confirmed that it would
raise the issue: "We feel there should be a code of conduct for investment
in farmland that will be a win-win situation for both producing and
consuming countries," he said.
Olivier De Schutter, special envoy for food at the UN Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights, said: "[The trend] is accelerating quickly.
All countries observe each other and when one sees others buying land it
does the same."
The UN's food and agricultural organization and other analysts estimate that
nearly 20m hectares (50m acres) of farmland - an area roughly half the size
of all arable land in Europe - has been sold or has been negotiated for sale
or lease in the last six months. Around 10m hectares was bought last year.
The land grab is being blamed on wealthy countries with concerns about food
security.
*Some of the largest deals include South Korea's acquisition of 700,000ha in
Sudan, and Saudi Arabia's purchase of 500,000ha in Tanzania. The Democratic
Republic of the Congo expects to shortly conclude an 8m-hectare deal with a
group of South African businesses to grow maize and soya beans as well as
poultry and dairy farming*.
*India has lent money to 80 companies to buy 350,000ha in Africa. At least
six countries are known to have bought large landholdings in Sudan, one of
the least food-secure countries in the world.*
*Other countries that have acquired land in the last year include the Gulf
states, Sweden, China and Libya. Those targeted include not only fertile
countries such as Brazil, Russia and Ukraine, but also poor countries like
Cameroon, Ethiopia, Madagascar, and Zambia.*
De Schutter said that after the food crisis of 2008, many countries found
food imports hit their balance of payments, "so now they want to insure
themselves".
"This is speculation, betting on future prices. What we see now is that
countries have lost trust in the international market. We know volatility
will increase in the next few years. Land prices will continue to rise. Many
deals are even now being negotiated. Not all are complete yet."
He said that about one-fifth of the land deals were expected to grow biofuel
crops. "But it is impossible to know with certainty because declarations are
not made as to what crops will be grown," he said.
Some of the world's largest food, financial and car companies have invested
in land.
Alpcot Agro of Sweden bought 120,000ha in Russia, South Korea's Hyundai has
paid $6.5m (£4m) for a majority stake in Khorol Zerno, which owns 10,000ha
in Eastern Siberia, while Morgan Stanley has bought 40,000ha in Ukraine.
Last year South Korea's Daewoo signed a 99-year lease for 1.3m hectares of
agricultural land in Madagascar.
Devinder Sharma, analyst with the Forum for Biotechnology and Food Security
in India, predicted civil unrest.
"Outsourcing food production will ensure food security for investing
countries but would leave behind a trail of hunger, starvation and food
scarcities for local populations," he said. "The environmental tab of highly
intensive farming - devastated soils, dry aquifer, and ruined ecology from
chemical infestation - will be left for the host country to pick up."
In Madagascar, the Daewoo agreement was seen as a factor in the subsequent
uprising that led to the ousting of the president, Marc Ravalomanana. His
replacement, Andry Rajoelina, immediately moved to repeal the deal.
Concern is mounting because much of the land has been targeted for its good
water supplies and proximity to ports. According to a report last month by
the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development,
the land deals "create risks and opportunities".
"Increased investment may bring benefits such as GDP growth and improved
government revenues, and may create opportunities for economic development
and livelihood improvement. But they may result in local people losing
access to the resources on which they depend for their food security -
particularly as some key recipient countries are themselves faced with food
security challenges", said the authors.
According to a US-based thinktank, the International Food Policy Research
Institute, nearly $20bn to $30bn a year is being spent by rich countries on
land in developing countries.
© 2009 Guardian News and Media Limited
----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----