webmaster
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2010
All rights reserved
From: Berhane Habtemariam (Berhane.Habtemariam@gmx.de)
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 15:30:23 EDT
Sudan feels the strain
Sudanese politicians should be wary of dancing on Garang's grave, warns
<mailto:gnkrumah@ahram.org.eg?subject=Front%20Page%20::%20Sudan%20feels%20th
e%20strain> Gamal Nkrumah
21 - 27 October 2010
_____
The scent of war is in the air. Tribal chieftains of the Arabised Messeriya
nomads of oil-rich Abyei ominously look on in disdain as they contemplate a
future without the rich pastureland their cattle have traditionally roamed
freely since time immemorial. Moreover, they are now concerned with how
they'll share the oil wealth of the enclave sandwiched between northern and
southern Sudan. The Abyei conundrum is a microcosm of the wider Sudanese
challenge.
The Messeriya chieftains met with leaders of the Dinka Ngok tribe in the
Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa this week to iron out differences. Southern
Sudanese maidens have been entertaining a host of foreign and local
dignitaries with their dances, their bare feet stamping the rich red earth
of southern Sudan, their anklets resonating with jingling and joyous sounds,
their melodious voices sonorous.
Closely watching the boisterous parade were sombre politicians grinning for
the cameras, some charlatans, others downright sinister. Yet those who
seriously uphold the political mantle of the late John Garang, first leader
of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), are overly enthusiastic
and sincere in their conviction that the unity of Sudan is paramount if the
country is to prosper and flourish.
Garang was a frequent visitor to Egypt, much respected among Egypt's
political establishment. His notion of Sudanese unity was highly credited in
Cairo. President Hosni Mubarak, Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit and other
senior Egyptian officials have reminded their Sudanese counterparts of the
wisdom and farsightedness of Garang's line.
The case for this optimism for unity is not clear-cut. The dissenters who
cast a long shadow of doubt on Garang's dreams believe that an independent
southern Sudan is the answer to the region's multifaceted challenges. The
objection is not that this approach of unity, as opposed to secession, leads
to the wrong answers being arrived at for their people's problems. Rather
that it will take too long to arrive at a solution to the historical divide
between northerners and southerners, a struggle for survival in which the
southerners have repeatedly lost -- in cultural, economic, political and
social terms. Any solution to the southern Sudanese political impasse
created with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in
January 2005 by Sudanese President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir's ruling National
Congress Party (NCP) and the SPLM will require radical concessions on both
sides.
Yet most of the touted alternatives would involve compromises that the
southerners are no longer willing to contemplate.
Former Sudanese foreign minister and leader of the breakaway SPLM for
Democratic Change (SPLM-DC) Lam Akol met with SPLM leader and Sudanese First
Vice-President Salva Kiir this week to resolve outstanding political
differences and to ensure that Al-Bashir's NCP watchdog does not continue to
play prosecutor, judge and jury.
Kiir launched the much vaunted Doing Business (DB) project which is
supported by the World Bank-managed Multi-Donor Trust (MDTF) and the United
States Agency for International Development (USAID). Intense economic
interests spur the current flurry of diplomatic activity by foreign powers
closely watching political developments in Sudan. They, too, are redrawing
maps, demarcating the borders of north and south. The DB is an admirable
objective as long as the vigour of southerners in Sudan is not impaired by
gross foreign interference.
Sudan, the third largest recipient of USAID after Afghanistan and Pakistan,
is struggling to preserve its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And,
the world -- not least Sudan's own African and Arab neighbours -- should be
mindful of the different, often rival roles played by the political parties
in the country. The voices in southern Sudan calling for secession have
reached a deafening crescendo. Southern Sudanese independence is on the
cards. If this happens the blame will in no small part be southern Sudan's.
Juba should use its new political powers guaranteed by the CPA and its
economic clout fuelled by its newfound oil wealth to foster Sudanese unity.
The north, too, shoulders much of the blame. Its insistence on instituting
Islamic Sharia law alienates the predominantly non-Muslim southerners. The
followers of Garang are in the forefront of the debate over the future of
Sudan. If Garang's vision prevails, and Sudan remains a single political
entity at peace with itself, then he will be vindicated.
The undeclared war between the southern Sudanese secessionists and those who
advocate the Garang dream is fast descending into a collision course. The
showdown could be a good thing for Sudan as long as it does not degenerate
into a fratricidal and farcical bloodbath. The impending political contest
as encapsulated in the referendum may force Sudanese politicians to address
issues they have so far preferred to skirt.
Kiir remains the most likely winner in next January's referendum, but a
tighter race with some of his political rivals both within the rank and file
of the SPLM and among rival parties will hopefully have to address the
shortcomings of southern politicians head-on. The vitally important question
of southern Sudanese secession deserves higher standards of debate than the
Sudanese politicians have offered so far.
The economy, the necessity for a faster pace of economic development and
other commercial considerations will feature prominently in the months to
come. Western powers and emerging Asian economies will vie for economic
supremacy in southern Sudan. The US might be the largest donor for the
moment, but Beijing interferes in Sudanese economic affairs on a far greater
scale than any other country. Its actions have a tremendous impact on
Sudan's economic fortunes and wellbeing.
Economic development will lift millions out of poverty in Sudan, but civil
war would most certainly not. How talk of unity and disunity brings out the
worst in everyone Sudanese. A return of the civil war -- Africa's longest --
is imminent. The Sudanese people will be the greatest losers. In this
respect it is no accident that Garang recommended unity as the way forward
for Sudan. Those who do not share Garang's vision offer two cavils, one
internal and the other external. The corruption that accompanies
oil-producing El Dorados in Africa will benefit the ensconced northern
political elite, with the tacit connivance of foreign multinationals, be
they Chinese or Western.
(see ' <http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1020/eg3.htm> Managing Sudan's
quagmire' & ' <http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1020/ed.htm> Saving Sudan')
----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----