On Eritrea Sanctions, China "Rejects Push for Action," Vote Switched to
Monday?
By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, November 30 -- While on Eritrea sanctions the US and Gabon
continued pushing Wednesday afternoon for a vote later in the day, more
opposition to the push became public.
Chinese Permanent Representative Li Baodong, on his way into the
consultations, told Inner City Press, "We reject any effort to push for
action." He added, "Let the President of Eritrea come to present his
statement."
The request by Isaias Afwerki of Eritrea to "be given the audience to
address the [UNSC] before any action is taken on the draft resolution" has
been blocked by US Ambassador Susan Rice. Inner City Press asked UK
Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant about Afwerki speaking.
"We have no objection," Lyall Grant said. Inner City Press asked if the UK
would call for a procedural vote, which would require a simple majority with
no veto powers. Lyall Grant said no, "We're not asking him to come, so
there's no reason for us to ask... If those who particularly want him to
come, I expect they'd call for a vote."
A number of Council members have told Inner City Press it would be a bad
precedent to not grant the request of a head of state to address the
Council, especially before sanctions. But who will call for that procedural
vote? "It's better it's by consensus," one member told Inner City Press. But
what deal might make the US move?
Update of 3:50 pm -- sources in the Council predict the vote pushed back "at
least" to Monday, and President Afwerki being invited.
(c) UN Photo
Li Baodong and Vitaly Churkin: no pasaran
Meanwhile while it was said the US has on its side, among Council African
members, not only Gabon but Nigeria, sources said that Nigeria either "wants
more time" or "is flexible." We'll see.
The US cites the position of IGAD on Eritrea -- at the same time IGAD is
telling Kenya to allow Omar al Bashir, indicted by the International
Criminal Court for genocide in Sudan, to visit without being arrested. If
the US cites IGAD favorably for one position, does it agree with this second
IGAD position? Watch this site.
<
http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pubid=ra-4e6013b3309f351d>
----[Mailing List for Eritrea Related News ]----
Received on Wed Nov 30 2011 - 16:18:19 EST