ICRC'S INCOMPLETE MISSION
G T
August 13, 1999
On August 8, 1999, Reuters reported on a visit by ICRC president Mr. Cornelio Sammuraga to the warring nations of Eritrea and Ethiopia. The article stated that the ICRC was denied access to Ethiopian POWs by Eritrea while Ethiopia gave the organization access to Eritrean POWs. (It is not clear who these POWs are .... were they captured during the war (which is possible) or were they picked up from the streets of Addis Abeba while they were going about their daily chores and declared POWs? The ICRC ought to provide answers to these questions.) It was also strange to note, however, that ICRC's president seemed to have been content and almost complimentary of the Ethiopian government by indicating that he "..... had received assurances from Meles that if there were a further deportation of Eritreans it would be done in accordance with international humanitarian laws, with no family separations and no unaccompanied children." For sure there were more in-depth conversations between Mr. Meles Zenawi and the ICRC president, however, it was bone-crushing to find out that the ICRC is willing and morally capable of settling for less than what was the right thing to do. May be the ICRC has, not one, but two books on its shelf , i.e., one for Africa and the second one for the rest of the world. This is to say the following:
One expects the ICRC to argue for NO deportations of citizens. It is reasonable to expect the humble but inquisitive ICRC president to pose the logical but prying questions to the Ethiopian premier. But, all of the basic issues that beg explanations are still unanswered. Here are just a handful :
Eritreans ought to be proud of the leadership in Asmara for their decency and humility. As long as people are involved, it is a given that mistakes will be done and as such one can never dare to say the Eritrean government did not err a dime during these tumultuous two years, going back to the time when Woyane actually forcefully took over Badme. However, it would not be a strenuous task to muster a global consensus that the Eritrean government's reputation has so far been unscathed. Eritrean leaders can walk through life with their chin up and their furs puffed-up. And, whenever things stabilize, the truth will continue to come out in larger volumes and Woyane's true color will glow in due time.
In the mean time, since Woyane's doings are well documented and publicized, what one would ask the ICRC to do is to document and publish how many Ethiopians were ever deported by the government of Eritrea, if any. It is almost unprofessional for the president of ICRC to stroll back and forth in the region and come out with nothing to independently clarify the conflicting reports. Ethiopia's bogus "deportee" statistics can not be compared to what they have done to Eritreans and Ethiopians of Eritrean origin. If Ethiopian "deportees" were directly displaced by the war, lost their jobs because businesses shut down, or were forced away by the Woyane officials themselves, these are all refugees but not deportees. The ICRC owes the people of Africa an honest, unpoliticized, and unambiguous and documented "state of affairs" report. Repeating what Woyane claims again and again will not help anyone. In addition to this, the ICRC should also inquire why Woyane continues to prevent "Eritreans" from leaving Ethiopia? If it does not consider them citizens, why hold them? Since when does one nation hold citizens of another nation hostage? To be "reasonable" to Woyane, the only thing that the world should be asking of them is, please LET ERITREANS LEAVE ETHIOPIA AND ALLOW THEM TO GO WHEREVER THEY WISH!!!
Not deporting them is not the end state, letting them do as they wish is !!! This is now all for ICRC to answer. Providing timely and accurate assessment should be the primary responsibility of an organization such as the ICRC. Its current role has failed to prevent mutual degradation. It needs to review its mission.
Rule-of-thumb: If you feel that the action you are about to take is something you would not feel comfortable defending in public, don't follow through with it as it may be illegal, unethical, or immoral. (Woyane has to answer this for itself. For those who are executing on behalf of their masters, the rule is no different.)