This is a banal mix of sin and righteousness working together to sustain an ethnic minority regime that is habitually violent, inhumane, and anti-peace. Added to these array of war footing is TPLF's ability to secure mercenary writers such as Paul Henze gunning false information hoping to perpetuate the conflict on which they depend for their bread and butter. Yes, Mr. Henze, a man of falsifications and misinformation, is actively encouraging the TPLF to go on pursuing its war project.
Mr. Paul Henze, with
characteristic shamelessness wears his turncoat garb and poses as an expert
to encourage war instead of advocating for peace. In the 1970s, Henze worked
for the Carter Administration as a National Security mid-level official
apparently with responsibilities on the Horn of Africa. Observers will
remember the Carter Administration's debacle on the Horn then. That Administration,
mixing flippant idealism with utter callousness, duplicity, and hypocrisy
on the field of human rights, tolerated the Mengistu regime as it conducted
the Red Terror between 1976-1978. Ethiopia was entrusted to the calculations
of Mr. Heinz
to offer his views to the Carter Administration. With his apparent
"analysis" of the Horn, he offered a policy mix of passive-offensive
neutrality as the world watched the Derg slaughter innocent civilians.
The rational of the analysis was that Ethiopia is a strategic point and
that any regime that comes to power, regardless of its methods of ruling,
must be passively repudiated on some issues, but actively indorsed on other
issues in order to protect the disintegration of the Ethiopian empire.
As the Derg intensified its brutalities, the Carter administration distanced
itself from the regime, but supported the Derg's war efforts against Eritrea.
Mr. Henze as the architect of the Horn policy is credited with America's
policy towards the Derg - a toleration of a genocidal regime to safeguard
a regional policy that was already a lost cause.
In the 1980s, Mr. Heinz went on to capitalize on his association with
the Carter Administration. Apparently the Rand Corporation saw nothing
wrong with having him as a "resident scholar" for spinning documents based
on Ethiopian newspapers, and embassy printouts to be packaged by Henze
at Rand offices as scholarly research. What a travesty of scholarship!
Even during the dark days of the Red Terror, Paul Henze managed to see
some carcass to salvage from the death and destruction which ravaged Ethiopia.
He used that
calamity to issue "studies" which were too elementary to be elevated
to the level of "studies." Today, Paul Henze is at work simultaneously
recruited by the TPLF to publicize propaganda lines framed in TPLF's media
outlets. They are compiled as "scholarly" insights at the magnificent offices
of Rand Corporation. This is another unhappy coincidence: Rand Croporation
unwittingly or wittingly hosting a man of no intellectual credibility and
allowing him to disseminate false information tailored to toe TPLF's propaganda
lines. How strong is money as a motivating factor for Rand Corporation
to allow its credibility to be compromised to the level of a
propagandist for an illegitimate rogue regime, ruling one of the most
poorly governed states in poor Africa? How is it that Rand's scholars,
otherwise known for their meticulous standards, are willing to allow imposter
scholarship in their company to go unchallenged?
In his latest pronouncements, Paul Henze informed a quote from President
Issaias Afewerki. Henze admitted that he appreciated the
President's peaceful approach to regional politics. However, in a manner
grossly unscrupulous, Henze blames the Eritrean President for resisting
aggression committed against Eritrea. Eritrea as a new regional member
in the Horn was loathed by Ethiopia and those who supported Ethiopia's
inhumanity in Eritrea. Even though some of those neighbors later recognized
Eritrea's independence, some were still luck warm, and even hostile to
the point of trying to destabilize Eritrea. Eritrea and its Head of State
stood firm and protected its sovereignty, as they always will and MUST.
To the TPLF and their mercenary writer, Paul Henze, Eritrea resisting aggressors
of its sovereignty is unacceptable. How dare the Eritrean President
assert Eritrean independence and sovereignty! It is the President's holy
duty to do so.
Heze's ill-tempered
outlook of Eritrea is his willingness to demonize Eritreans by demonizeing
the Eritrean President. This is a
calculated strategy designed by a racist American warmonger taking
advantage of African crisis to perpetuate war, and mayhem among Africans.
It has been used in the past, and Henze has found effective vehicle in
the personification of the TPLF to propagate his racist dream of seeing
Africans kill each other. As long as he is fortunate enough to have African
war devils hark to his call, he will persist in his fascistic propaganda
to reap his silent reward of death and destruction of Eritreans and Ethiopians.
Paul Henze stands out as an advocate for war among Africans in contrast
to the many good Americans who are calling for peace and development among
Africans.
Many of the research
organizations in the West have their roots in conservative attitudes. Most
of their funds are generated from conservative donors who were phobic about
decolonization and communism. Communism came in different forms. It came
as an anti-imperialist philosophy designed to confront colonial values
and way of life. It also came as an inspiration for Third World countries
who were ending their struggle against imperialism, colonialism, and Apartheid.
The targets for vilifications by conservative think tanks were Africans
who wanted to set themselves free from colonialism, imperialism, and Apartheid.
They were singled out for demonization and falsifications. Conservative
think tanks had recruited, financed, and advised foolhardy African clients
and actively lobbied for
the Apartheid regime in South Africa, the UNITA of Angola, the Lords
Resistance of Uganda, and the Renamo of Mozambique all known for their
savagery against Africans. There is nothing to differentiate Paul Henze's
eagerness from the eagerness of those who resisted Africa's independence
and freedom. As he condemns Eritrea unfairly, and advises Ethiopia to deport
Eritreans, boycott Eritrean ports, and to prepare to do war with Eritreans,
he is expressing his hatred of Africans. He is one of those mercenary writers
who benefit from the death and destruction so common in Africa and in Ethiopia
in particular. He benefits from the shelterings of the Rand Corproration,
a think tank with little heart for Africa and Africans.