It Is Not Suicide to Accept the Peace Agreement
By: Aster Iyasu, The Netherlands
October 19, 2003
The fact the matter, it is not suicide to accept the peace agreement, but it
is suicide not to accept it. This is true in the case of the Ethiopian government,
because by accepting the peace agreement, respecting the international law and
abiding by the rule of law; it would be the greatest service the government
could possibly do for the Ethiopian people. But, if
the Ethiopian government continues to reject the peace agreement, which is decided
by the Boundary Commission as final and binding, to the dismay of all of us,
it would be disastrous not only for Ethiopia but also for the whole region,
particularly the Horn of Africa.
In my opinion, the main reason why the TPLF regime rejecting the Border Decision
and is also beating the war drums is that in the first place, the minority regime
has failed to inform the public the facts on the ground especially when both
parties was told the Border Decision that was made public by the EEBC in April
13, 2002. As consequence of that I have developed a puzzle that I couldn't able
to figure it out. How could the Addis Ababa government give false information
to the 60-plus million Ethiopian people and couldn't able to fix it right?
In April 13, 2002, just a few hours after the Border Decision the Ethiopian
Foreign Minister, Seyoum Mesfun, told the Ethiopian people that the contested
area -Badme- is given to Ethiopia. In his infamous letter of September 19, 2003
Prime Minister Meles Zenawi accused the Boundary commission of giving Badme
illegally to Eritrea. This two conflicting events are giving headache and troubling
dilemma to the TPLF regime. But,
the ironic danger of this situation is that the effort for peace in the region
could collapse not from the Ethiopian government's acts of desperate adventure,
but from the failure of the international community in general and the UN's
Security Council in particular to put a pressure on the TPLF regime to abide
by final and binding decision of the Boundary Commission for Eritrea and Ethiopia.
Now, it is clear that everything is up to the UN and the Security Council to
decide the direction of the peace agreement in the Horn Africa. I believe, the
international community, the UN, the EU, the US and the AU must realize that
it is in the best interest of the Ethiopian people that the ADDIS ABABA GOVERNMENT
to cooperate for the implementation of the final process of the peace agreement.
Which direction are we heading to? Is it to the final peace or to the disastrous
and carnage of war? Once again this question is reserved to the International
Community and the UNSC to give us a full answer. Hopefully, if the UN, UNSC
and the others want to maintain the momentum behind the EEBC's Border Decision,
they will have to make a greater pressure diplomatically and politically. That
would give the guarantors of the
Algiers Peace Agreement of Ethiopia-Eritrea a golden opportunity to do something
concrete to end the bloodletting in Ethiopia and Eritrea.
A useful beginning would be the understanding of the historical back ground
of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Both countries can not sustain another war and carnage.
Ethiopia must be stopped before it starts another disastrous war. Clearly, the
success of guaranteeing peace in the region will require overcoming main obstacle:
It relies heavily on the International Community to impose a pressure on Ethiopia
to abide by the rule of law. Otherwise it
would be too late to stop the interminable bloodletting conflict.