Dangling and Limping on the Scale of Justice -Part III-
By: Ogbazgy Abbay Asmerom
April 1, 2004
-- Evil triumphs when good men keep silent --
Part III
The deportation process caused a lot of family dislocation. It was the most
heartbreaking episode. In fact, it was the ugliest incident that ever happened
in the history of the two nations. The writer of this essay knows the intimate
and personal stories of some families who were deported from Tigray and Ethiopia.
Their stories and ordeals make you bite your tongue and gnash your teeth! While
the Weyanie regime was committing the most flagrant violation of Human Rights,
the UNSG and UNSC did not utter a word. Thus, the Ethiopian government broke
the protocol of The Declaration of Human Rights Convention of 1948. Due to the
silence of the UNSC, the evil ways of the Ethiopian government continued without
any restraint.
Eritrea has fully accepted the verdict of the Decision. Eritrea is not the guilty
party. Eritrea has complied. It is waiting for the implementation of the Border
Decision. Why is this so hard for the guarantors to understand? Are they not
politically astute and savvy to know the difference between accepting and rejecting
the verdict? Do they not know the language of absurdity and anomaly?
The UNSC has the means, mechanisms, and systems to make Ethiopia comply, but
has not done it. It has the tools to be used. It must use them before it is
too late! When it comes to the implementation of the demarcation process, the
UNSC has shown the seeds of inaction, partiality and has abandoned its international
responsibility. It has to invoke the provisions of Chapter Seven of is Charter
and punish the guilty party, which is Ethiopia. Severe Economic Sanction must
be imposed on Ethiopia so that it accepts the verdict.
Let us look at some of the famous treaties where there was no dangling and limping
on the scale of justice by any entity. There was no known deception or attempt
made by the affected parties, like the one being practiced by Ethiopia, which
has prevented the implementation of an international instrument. For those who
may have forgotten some historical facts, the following historical treaties
can be cited as examples: Westphalia (1648), Utrecht (1714), Paris (1783), Ghent
(1815), Vienna (1848), Paris (1898), Versailles (1919), Yalta (1945), Panmunjon
(1953), and Paris (1973). If anyone of the above-mentioned peace treaties were
neglected and abandoned, the world would have been the worst place to live in.
Due to the acceptance and implementation of those treaties, we have established
borders and mechanisms of international diplomacy.
The Organization of African Unity (OAU), now African Union (AU), is the most
inept, indecisive and weakest link. It has completely abandoned its regional
responsibility. It has become the domestic “slave” of Ethiopia. It is a shame
to have an organization that is a disgrace to the continent! Its headquarters,
located in Addis Abeba, only serves the interests of Ethiopia. Its position
in Eritrea is very dismal. Since its inception in 1963, the OAU never raised
the Eritrea issue, especially when Eritrea was fighting for its national liberation
from Ethiopian Colonialism.
The Organization was keeping the interests of Emperor Haileselassie and Mengistu
Hailemariam. Its present position has not changed. Currently, the AU, which
is one of the guarantors of the peace accord, has not uttered a word concerning
the demarcation process. It has been mute and dumb. In fact, it is being used
by Ethiopia to hoodwink public opinion and has remained silent on the demarcation
process. While Ethiopia was committing the most flagrant Human Rights violations
in its backyard, the African Union did not issue a statement to condemn the
deportation of Eritreans.
It is also a shame to note that in its recent deliberations, the AU has chosen
Ethiopia to be one of the African Security Council members to preserve peace
in Africa. This can be compared to assigning a “fox to keep the chicken coop.”
Can Ethiopia help in maintaining African peace, when it is the only country
that is causing the instability in the region? Can Ethiopia be trusted to maintain
peace in the Horn of Africa? We all know what has happened to Somalia! Somalia
is in a distressful situation because of Ethiopia! Do not the member states
see the inconsistency of the organization? Is it not Ethiopia that has caused
the instability of the region?
The European Union seems to be more reasonable when it comes to letting Ethiopia
know its diplomatic and political limits. The French and the Germans have voiced
some displeasure against Ethiopia and wanted to see it comply with the Border
Decision. Their progressive nature of governance does help them see the world
via a different lens. It is encouraging to note that the Germans are entertaining
the idea of imposing some economic sanctions against Ethiopia. The French will
follow the same direction. Still, the French do believe in liberty, equality,
and fraternity. They have some sense of justice.
American and British diplomats have shown the most arrogant attitude towards
the implementation of the Demarcation Process. They seem to embrace the position
of the Ethiopian government. Both nations seem to be stuck in the cobweb of
Ethiopian deception and intrigues. London and Washington seem to preach a form
of non-existent international principle, democratic form of government, transparency,
and the application of the rule of law, while they are the main violators of
international laws. Both of them were heard loud and clear talking constantly
about RESOLUTION 1414 and its implementation, which they arrogantly and erroneously
believed that the resolution had given them the green light and sole right to
invade and destroy Iraq.
The British need to know the heyday of Imperial Power, where the sun never sets,
is over. The years they spent in Eritrea (1941-1952) were full of contradictions.
Some of the mistakes committed by the British in Eritrea are not forgotten from
the memories of those who witnessed what had happened. The British Empire is
history!
The Americans need to learn a lesson that dominating the world by any means
necessary is a disaster. The lessons of the Revolutionary War of the 1770s should
be remembered. Justice applies to all! The USA needs to realize that humility,
truth, and justice must be its hallmarks. Washington has some knowledge about
Eritrea. The American used an Eritrean military base for more than 30 years
(1942-1978) and had played a negative role in Eritrean politics.
Some American diplomats have suggested that if Eritrea does not accept the appointment
of Lloyd Axworthy it will “face some diplomatic isolation!” What does this mean?
Did Ethiopia face any isolation by refusing to accept the verdict? Which one
of the two countries is in serious trouble and which one has broken an international
law?
Ignoring an instrument of an international law will create more havoc. There
will be more instability in the Horn of Africa because of the political expediency
taken by the American and British governments. Eritrea knows very clearly the
positions taken by both countries in the 1940s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s when
it comes to the Eritrean cause. In 1991, Eritrean independence was an irreversible
fact and the two countries could not do anything to prevent it. It was a fait
accompli! Thus, grudgingly they accepted what Ethiopia was forced to accept.
To be continued …………