Meles the Badger and The British Government
By: S.Marcos
June 22, 2005
Meles's name is derived from the French word bêcheur' which means a digger.
Indeed, Meles is a good digger. Meles has a striking black and white striped
head. It can grow up to a meter long and weighs up to 14 kg. Meles has powerful
claws and legs with which it can dig and move earth. It keeps opening up new
setts & extending old ones to expand empire. I am not talking about Meles
Zenawi of Ethiopia, the butcher, and I am not also talking about his digging,
expansion and settlement programs on other people’s land. To be fair to the
man, he also weighs more than 14kg and surely stands taller than a meter.
I am talking about Meles the badger.
Anyone who works within the realm of the environment knows that Meles-Meles
is a type of badger, which enjoys an extremely high level of legal protection
in the UK under the Protection of Badgers Act, 1992, and Schedule 6 of the
Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981. It is illegal to intentionally kill or
trap Meles-Meles except by applying for a license. It is also illegal to touch
their setts. Many multi-million projects have been shelved because of this
species. If a group of Meles-Meles decide to make your garden their home,
you have no right to get anywhere near them.
It seems that the British government has wittingly or unwittingly extended
this protection to another Meles, the Prime Minister of Ethiopia. The British
don’t like anyone messing around with Meles. He is the shining star of the
bushes, the endangered species of Africa, the ‘progressive’, the visionary,
the intelligent, and the highly skilled who can’t set a foot wrong …………well
until last week.
Last week saw the real Meles exposed with his reputation in tatters. It was
an awful scene even by Meles’s standard. He mowed down mercilessly 36 protestors
and wounded hundreds more. Although the world tried to cover it up in the
past, it is known that this was not his first time. In April 2001, he was
responsible for killing more than 46 people and wounding over 500 more in
putting down a student demonstration at Addis Ababa University. In 2002, his
soldiers killed 230 peaceful demonstrators in Oromia and Southern regions
of Ethiopia – including 25 farmers in the city of Awasa. In December 2003,
his troops again massacred 424 unarmed Anuaks in the Gambella province, South-western
Ethiopia. In the ensuing months, over 2,500 more Anuaks were killed while
60,000 fled the region to neighbouring Sudan and Kenya. This time around,
he has taken it too far and Meles the digger is digging his own grave.
Meles is building schools, 400 new houses, and other infrastructures on sovereign
Eritrean territory. Although UNSC Resolution 1430 determined that no movement
of peoples and new settlements be undertaken, Meles has been moving his people
in broad daylight to settle on Eritrean land.
Meles expelled over 70,000 innocent Eritreans and Ethiopians of Eritrean origin
including unaccompanied children and the elderly without any legal process
and confiscated their properties just because in his own words ‘he didn’t
like the colour of their eyes’.
Meles Zenawi has squandered 3 billion dollars on the war against Eritrea at
a time when 15 million Ethiopians were at the verge of dying from hunger.
In 2004 alone, Meles spent US$339 million on arms.
Thanks to Meles, Ethiopia remains to be one of the poorest nations in the
world despite the fact that it is by far the largest recipient of all foreign
aid in the sub-Saharan Africa amounting to US$1 billion a year excluding food
aid.
Meles is the only leader in the modern world who has rejected with impunity
a final and binding ruling of a boundary commission. Even the man considered
as insane by the West, Colonel Gadafi of Libya has respected and accepted
a border ruling delivered in favour of Chad.
With his record, Meles shames Mugabe many times over. The difference between
the despicable Mugabe and Meles is that the latter is prepared to sweet talk
with a begging bowl in hand and is pleased to have a brown nose at every opportunity.
Meles’s government was critically condemned for harassing, illegally detaining,
torturing, killing members of political oppositions and demonstrators. On
June 14, Meles’s police killed a member of the Oromo National Congress (ONC)
and arrested other members of the opposition.
It is against all the above that the British government went out of its way
to give unqualified protection to their toy boy, Meles Zenawi. Before they
realised it, however, the spoilt child has grown to be a monster. It was rather
funny seeing Meles Zenawi standing shoulder height between the rather tall
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and giggle uncontrollably while looking up to
his masters like a naughty child who had just been given a candy. Badger’s
Act may have saved badgers from extinction, but with the current development
in Ethiopia, even an Act of parliament, Meles’s Act, is not going to save
Meles. Meles the trickster has run out of tricks. His forked-tongues could
no longer deliver.
Against the advice of many, Meles was appointed as commissioner in the Commission
for Africa whose principles stand at odds with everything that Meles has done
so far. In an interview, Myles Wickstead, the ex-British Ambassador to Ethiopia
and currently the Head of the Secretariat of the Commission for Africa stated,
"…the decision to invite certain people to become members of the Commission
was made by the Prime Minister. So they are personal invitations from him
to people with whom he has created a good relationship, with whom he feels
he has a good sort of working relationship… people were selected for their
individual capabilities…”. As outrageous as it may sound, Meles, with his
abysmal record, was handpicked to come up with a panacea for Africa’s problem.
The fate of Africans was left in the hands of a butcher and a lawless criminal.
There cannot be a sane African in this planet who would not see this as an
insult.
The British government encouraged Meles to flout international law with respect
to the Eritrean Ethiopian border ruling. One senior official stated once that
“there is no thought that the British Government puts a gun to the head and
says Britain will no longer provide you with financial assistance unless you
immediately give effect to the decision of the Boundary Commission”. Putting
a gun to someone’s head may only be Mr Zenawi’s style, but the British no
doubt could have used their considerable leverage to force compliance. Unfortunately,
true to its words, the British government has not so far lifted a finger to
ensure that the Algiers Agreement is respected. Meles is not Sadam and Ethiopia
is not Iraq.
Meles spends many times over the money he receives from the British government
on buying weapons. Figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, a report by id21 and the World Bank indicate that the arms spending
has been increasing year on year. Yet, the British government has tripled
the financial assistance given to Ethiopia, with a plan to double that again.
This is not in any way tied to Ethiopia’s acceptance of the border ruling.
Any person with the right state of mind would know that sustainable development
cannot be achieved without peace and security, and most of this so called
aid would be squandered and be diverted to the war effort.
Without giving due attention to the record of the Ethiopian government led
by Meles, The British government decided to act as the champion in the campaign
for Ethiopia’s debt to be cancelled without any preconditions. Ethiopia receives
about $2 billion in aid annually including debt relief, food, aid, budgetary
support and development assistance. Ethiopia has received tens of billions
of dollars in aid over the last 3 decades. Yet, all economic indicators of
the World Bank and others suggest that things are getting worse and not better.
What is then the logic of pouring good money after bad? How is it that the
British government gives so much money without making an effort to secure
peace in the region? There is no doubt that British tax payers would strongly
oppose had they known what the British government has been up to. It must
be said that there is no country in the world that deserves more help than
Ethiopia and you will not find many people as hospitable as Ethiopians save
the elite and the ruling class. It must however be realised that pouring money
on Ethiopia through Meles’s government without addressing the fundamental
issue of peace and security is no different from building a house on a soft
alluvium. It will sooner or later crumble leaving the occupiers of the house
in a more desperate situation.
The British government has been instrumental in encouraging the world to buy
the idea of ‘open ended dialogue’ as a way of solving the problem between
Ethiopia and Eritrea. Chris Mullin, the former Minister for Africa, is believed
to be the architect of the new so called peace proposal by PM Meles Zenawi.
In January 2004, he had said in a press conference in Addis Ababa, "We are
looking to Ethiopia to accept the border decision in principle and enter into
dialogue." He also stated that, "We are calling on Ethiopia to accept in principle
the decision to be on equal footing on moral grounds with Eritrea, who are
now having the upper moral ground." Meles Zenawi almost parroted what Mr Mullin
had said. The British government was one of the very first of the few countries
to welcome Ethiopia’s bogus ‘peace plan’. In a joint statement, Chris Mullin
and Hilary Benn stated that the Ethiopian move represented “an important step
forward, which the international community has been urging the Ethiopian government
to take.” No surprise there. No surprise also that even with the support of
the British government, Meles’s plan was dead on arrival.
There has also been a report on the BBC Monitoring Service on Dec 19, 2004
that, concerned by the US silence to Meles’s ‘peace plan’, an Ethiopian delegation
travelled to the USA to explain the plan and solicit support. It was reported
that British experts who sympathize with Ethiopia’s position and with diplomatic
experience gained from the British Foreign Office, accompanied Ethiopia’s
delegation headed by Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin. Their involvement is
more than what meets the eye.
Mr Brown, UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, also stated in parliament that
there are still outstanding issues with the boundary commission’s ruling.
Mr Brown would not explain what these outstanding issues are. Mr Mullin, the
ex-Minister for Africa, was also convinced that Eritrea has to be forced into
negotiation. In one of his responses in parliament, he said, “Professor Lauterpacht,
who ‘was’ the chairman of the Eritrea-Ethiopia boundary commission, has said
that any issue can be discussed, provided that both parties agree. We think
that that should happen, and that is the view that we are making clear to
all parties, including the Eritreans.” The British government knows well that
there is no provision made in the Algiers peace agreement for any ‘dialogue’
and negotiation on an already settled dispute to take place. The world and
especially Eritreans cannot be hoodwinked by the efforts of the British government
to make the Ethiopian stance palatable.
Aid donors have been providing huge sums to Ethiopia to keep its economy afloat
while starving Eritrea of any development assistance. The strategy as I see
it is aimed at prolonging the implementation of the ruling as much as possible
in order to strangle Eritrea economically to an extent that the government
will be forced to enter into a dialogue and accept Ethiopia’s illegal demand.
This emanates from the underestimation of the resilience and determination
of the Eritrean people to see justice prevail.
With his name tarnished by the Iraq war, there is no doubt that Tony Blair
is eager to leave a legacy behind that will take people’s mind off his past
track record. If Blair is dreaming of achieving prosperity in Ethiopia at
the expense of Eritrea, then he is seriously mistaken. Tony has ignored our
pleas, our letters, and our demonstrations. He will retire from politics at
the end of this term and live with Cherie and his kids happily ever after.
Many years later after he has left the scene, the unfortunate people of the
Horn would still be picking up the mess he is leaving behind.
It doesn’t matter how much effort Tony Blair spends in covering up and beautifying
a badger, a badger will always remain a badger. Regardless of his effort to
pull wool over the eyes of the world, last week’s atrocities in Ethiopia cannot
be justified. Following the massacre, I would not be surprised if more funding
is made available to train the brutal Agazi force that came down from the
north to squash the dissent, because that is exactly what happened in 2001,
2002, 2003 and 2004. It would not be a surprise to see the British government
denounce the actions of the Ethiopian government in public and at the same
time try to dress a broken leg.
The sufferings of the Eritrean people over the last half-century is not of
their own making, but the result of the unfair and unjust policies imposed
by successive British governments, UN and others alike. When the British liberated
Eritrea, Eritreans hoped that they would be fair and just. Instead the British
dismantled and looted the country’s main infrastructures worth over 2 billion
pounds and left nothing that is worth few shillings. The British bartered
over Eritrea’s destiny and were party to the hand over of a country and people
to a neighbouring country without their will. This decision led to a destructive
and bloody war. Over 60 years later, Eritreans still expected fairness and
justice from the British. They ‘didn’t do it for us’ in the past and it appears
that ‘they will not do it for us’ now. Tony Blair may be in love with a nasty
‘badger’, but he must realise now that the countdown to the end of the badger’s
era has commenced and nothing can stop it.