[dehai-news] Why bombing Ashkelon is the most tragic irony


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: wolda002@umn.edu
Date: Wed Dec 31 2008 - 00:19:28 EST


Robert Fisk: Why bombing Ashkelon is the most tragic irony

Tuesday, 30 December 2008

Independent.co.uk Web

How easy it is to snap off the history of the Palestinians, to delete the
narrative of their tragedy, to avoid a grotesque irony about Gaza which –
in any other conflict – journalists would be writing about in their first
reports: that the original, legal owners of the Israeli land on which Hamas
rockets are detonating live in Gaza.

That is why Gaza exists: because the Palestinians who lived in Ashkelon and
the fields around it – Askalaan in Arabic – were dispossessed from
their lands in 1948 when Israel was created and ended up on the beaches of
Gaza. They – or their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren
– are among the one and a half million Palestinian refugees crammed into
the cesspool of Gaza, 80 per cent of whose families once lived in what is
now Israel. This, historically, is the real story: most of the people of
Gaza don't come from Gaza.

But watching the news shows, you'd think that history began yesterday, that
a bunch of bearded anti-Semitic Islamist lunatics suddenly popped up in the
slums of Gaza – a rubbish dump of destitute people of no origin – and
began firing missiles into peace-loving, democratic Israel, only to meet
with the righteous vengeance of the Israeli air force. The fact that the
five sisters killed in Jabalya camp had grandparents who came from the very
land whose more recent owners have now bombed them to death simply does not
appear in the story.

Both Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres said back in the 1990s that they wished
Gaza would just go away, drop into the sea, and you can see why. The
existence of Gaza is a permanent reminder of those hundreds of thousands of
Palestinians who lost their homes to Israel, who fled or were driven out
through fear or Israeli ethnic cleansing 60 years ago, when tidal waves of
refugees had washed over Europe in the aftermath of the Second World War
and when a bunch of Arabs kicked out of their property didn't worry the
world.

Well, the world should worry now. Crammed into the most overpopulated few
square miles in the whole world are a dispossessed people who have been
living in refuse and sewage and, for the past six months, in hunger and
darkness, and who have been sanctioned by us, the West. Gaza was always an
insurrectionary place. It took two years for Ariel Sharon's bloody
"pacification", starting in 1971, to be completed, and Gaza is not going to
be tamed now.

Alas for the Palestinians, their most powerful political voice – I'm
talking about the late Edward Said, not the corrupt Yassir Arafat (and how
the Israelis must miss him now) – is silent and their predicament largely
unexplained by their deplorable, foolish spokesmen. "It's the most
terrifying place I've ever been in," Said once said of Gaza. "It's a
horrifyingly sad place because of the desperation and misery of the way
people live. I was unprepared for camps that are much worse than anything I
saw in South Africa."

Of course, it was left to Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to admit
that "sometimes also civilians pay the price," an argument she would not
make, of course, if the fatality statistics were reversed. Indeed, it was
instructive yesterday to hear a member of the American Enterprise Institute
– faithfully parroting Israel's arguments – defending the outrageous
Palestinian death toll by saying that it was "pointless to play the numbers
game". Yet if more than 300 Israelis had been killed – against two dead
Palestinians – be sure that the "numbers game" and the disproportionate
violence would be all too relevant. The simple fact is that Palestinian
deaths matter far less than Israeli deaths. True, we know that 180 of the
dead were Hamas members. But what of the rest? If the UN's conservative
figure of 57 civilian fatalities is correct, the death toll is still a
disgrace.

To find both the US and Britain failing to condemn the Israeli onslaught
while blaming Hamas is not surprising. US Middle East policy and Israeli
policy are now indistinguishable and Gordon Brown is following the same
dog-like devotion to the Bush administration as his predecessor.

As usual, the Arab satraps – largely paid and armed by the West – are
silent, preposterously calling for an Arab summit on the crisis which will
(if it even takes place), appoint an "action committee" to draw up a report
which will never be written. For that is the way with the Arab world and
its corrupt rulers. As for Hamas, they will, of course, enjoy the
discomfiture of the Arab potentates while cynically waiting for Israel to
talk to them. Which they will. Indeed, within a few months, we'll be
hearing that Israel and Hamas have been having "secret talks" – just as
we once did about Israel and the even more corrupt PLO. But by then, the
dead will be long buried and we will be facing the next crisis since the
last crisis.

         ----[This List to be used for Eritrea Related News Only]----


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

webmaster
© Copyright DEHAI-Eritrea OnLine, 1993-2008
All rights reserved