Dehai News

https://theduran.com/netherlands-government-continues-blackout  

Netherlands Government Continues Blackout on Already-Viral Police Scandal

30 May 2026, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)

Here is the video of the event on May 19th that now has become viral online despite being ignored by the Dutch Government and mainstream media already for 11 days:

——

https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/2060735136509874671  

Lord Bebo

@MyLordBebo

 Dutch police threw a pregnant woman to the floor while her husband was obeying the police with his hands behind his back.

According to the woman, they went to talk to the police because she wanted to ask if she could stay with her husband.

She gave birth to a child. The baby came early but is alive and healthy. 

Content Warning: Graphic Content

X labeled this post as containing Graphic Content.

10:48 AM · May 30, 2026

·

33.9K Views

——

Click onto that x.com report to see and hear the video.

I asked ChatGPT about this, and here was my conversation:

“dutch police pregnant baby husband”

If you're referring to the viral video circulating today, it appears to show a Dutch police officer forcefully throwing a visibly pregnant woman to the ground while officers were detaining her husband or partner. The husband then reacted and confronted the officer before other police intervened. The footage has generated substantial criticism online.

At the moment, the publicly available information is limited. The video itself is widely shared, but there has not yet been a detailed official police explanation of the events leading up to the incident. Reports indicate that the woman was pregnant and that the man involved was her husband or partner.

If this is the incident you're asking about, I can try to find:

who the couple were,

where in the Netherlands it occurred,

whether the police department has issued a statement,

whether an investigation has been opened,

and what happened to the husband afterward.

“Yes, please, all of that.”

The most detailed information currently available indicates that the incident occurred on 19 May 2026 at an asylum-seekers' center in Zeist, near Utrecht. Police had reportedly been called in response to allegations of vandalism and threats involving a knife. During what Dutch police described as a "dynamic arrest," an officer grabbed a visibly pregnant woman and she fell or was thrown to the ground; video of the incident later went viral.

Regarding the husband:

He appears in the video rushing toward the officer immediately after seeing his pregnant wife hit the ground.

Other officers restrained him.

According to the information currently circulating, a 30-year-old man was later released without charges. Reports have identified him as the woman's partner/husband, though official police statements have not yet publicly confirmed the relationship.

Regarding the woman:

She was visibly pregnant in the video.

Dutch police have reportedly stated that no injuries were immediately reported at the scene.

An update circulating on 30 May said that she subsequently gave birth safely to a healthy child, though I have not yet found an official Dutch police or hospital statement independently confirming that report.

As for investigations:

Dutch police have reportedly opened an internal review and are examining body-camera footage and other evidence to determine whether the force used was proportionate and lawful.

The incident has generated significant public criticism on social media and in international news-sharing accounts.

One caution: much of the detailed reporting so far comes from viral-video accounts and social-media summaries rather than established Dutch newspapers. The basic facts (pregnant woman, officer's use of force, husband's reaction, Zeist location, police review) appear reasonably consistent across reports, but some claims—especially about the baby's birth and the precise circumstances preceding the arrest—should still be treated as provisional pending fuller reporting from Dutch authorities or major Dutch media outlets.

If you'd like, I can also search Dutch-language sources to see whether Dutch police or Dutch newspapers have issued a more complete account of what led to the confrontation.

“Please do.”

I searched for Dutch-language reporting and official information, but at the moment there appears to be remarkably little beyond the viral video itself and secondary reports discussing it.

The points that seem reasonably well established are:

The incident occurred on 19 May 2026 at an asylum-seekers' center in Zeist, near Utrecht.

Police say they were responding to reports involving vandalism and threats with a knife.

During what police described as a "dynamic arrest," an officer grabbed the visibly pregnant woman and she fell to the ground.

Her husband/partner immediately rushed toward the officer and was restrained by other officers.

A 30-year-old man was later released without charges.

Utrecht-area police reportedly began reviewing body-camera footage and other evidence to determine whether the force used was proportionate.

What I could not verify from reliable Dutch newspaper or official police sources is:

the identities or nationalities of the couple,

whether the husband was formally arrested,

whether the woman suffered injuries,

whether she subsequently gave birth,

whether disciplinary action has been taken against the officer,

whether prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation.

Many of the claims circulating online about the baby's condition or the family's background appear to trace back to social-media posts rather than established reporting.

My assessment is that the video became internationally viral faster than Dutch mainstream media covered it. As a result, there is currently a gap between what millions of people have seen in the footage and what has been independently verified in published reporting.

If you wish, I can continue searching specifically in Dutch sources for:

any statement by the Dutch national police,

coverage in major Dutch newspapers such as NRC, de Volkskrant, or Algemeen Dagblad,

whether the officer has been suspended,

whether the woman has filed a complaint,

and whether body-camera footage has been released.

I found one potentially important development from Dutch local news aggregation that was not appearing in the international reports.

According to a listing of a report by Dutch regional broadcaster RTV Utrecht, published on 30 May, the headline is:

"Police investigate use of force during arrest in Zeist; pregnant woman falls."

That headline itself confirms that Dutch police are formally investigating the force used in the incident.

From the more detailed reports available, the following appears to be the most reliable current picture:

The incident occurred on 19 May 2026 at an asylum-seekers' center in Zeist.

Police were responding to reports of vandalism and knife threats.

During an arrest, an officer grabbed the pregnant woman and she fell to the ground.

Her partner/husband reacted immediately and moved toward the officer.

A 30-year-old man was detained but later released without charge.

Police are reviewing body-camera footage and other evidence to determine whether the force used was proportionate.

What I could not verify from Dutch mainstream reporting:

The identities of the woman or her husband.

Whether the officer has been suspended.

Whether prosecutors have opened a criminal case.

Whether the woman filed a formal complaint.

Whether the baby was born prematurely or suffered any harm.

Those claims continue to circulate widely online, but I could not find confirmation from Dutch police, prosecutors, or major Dutch news organizations.

One thing that stands out is that Dutch media appear to be treating this primarily as a police-use-of-force investigation, not as a routine arrest. The fact that regional news is reporting an active police review suggests the matter has moved beyond mere social-media controversy.

If you want, I can also search specifically for:

statements by Dutch political parties,

reactions in the Dutch Parliament,

whether the officer's name or disciplinary status has become public,

or whether any body-camera footage has since been released.

“Please do.”

I searched for developments specifically concerning parliamentary reactions, disciplinary action, and official statements. At present, there appears to be a striking lack of confirmed information beyond the police review itself.

What can be verified:

Dutch police have acknowledged that they are reviewing the use of force during the 19 May incident at the asylum-seekers' center in Zeist and are examining body-camera footage and other evidence.

The widely circulated video appears to show the woman stepping between officers and her husband/partner immediately before the officer seized her arm and she fell.

The 30-year-old man involved was reportedly released without charges.

What I could not verify from reliable Dutch reporting:

Any statement by the Dutch House of Representatives (the House of Representatives of the Netherlands) or major parliamentary parties.

Any parliamentary questions submitted by members of parliament.

Any suspension, reassignment, or disciplinary action against the officer.

Any public identification of the officer.

Any prosecutor's announcement of a criminal investigation.

Any official confirmation regarding the pregnancy outcome or the baby's health.

The absence of parliamentary reaction is somewhat unusual given the video's visibility, but it may simply reflect timing. In the Netherlands, police-use-of-force controversies often undergo an internal and prosecutorial review before becoming a major national political issue.

My current assessment is that the strongest confirmed fact is still the existence of the official police review. Claims circulating online that the officer has been suspended, that the woman went into premature labor, or that Dutch politicians have demanded prosecutions remain unverified based on the sources currently available.

If you wish, I can also look specifically for:

statements from Dutch human-rights organizations,

reactions from refugee and asylum-advocacy groups,

Dutch-language social-media discussions,

or whether any Dutch television programs (NOS, RTL Nieuws, Nieuwsuur, SBS6) have covered the case.

“Please do.”

After searching further, I still cannot find evidence that major Dutch political parties, Parliament, or prominent Dutch human-rights organizations have yet made public statements about this specific incident.

What appears confirmed:

The incident occurred on 19 May 2026 at the asylum-seekers' center in Zeist.

Police were responding to reports involving vandalism and alleged knife threats.

A visibly pregnant woman was grabbed during a police action and fell to the ground.

Her husband/partner reacted immediately, and police restrained him.

Police have opened a review of the use of force.

What remains unconfirmed:

Suspension or discipline of the officer.

Release of body-camera footage.

Parliamentary questions or debates.

Formal interventions by Dutch human-rights NGOs.

A criminal investigation by prosecutors.

One reason may be that Dutch procedure typically separates the initial police review from political involvement. If prosecutors or the police watchdog later conclude that excessive force may have occurred, political attention often follows afterward.

Regarding the pregnancy, the strongest current reporting is that the woman later gave birth safely and that the child was healthy, but this information appears to originate from viral-news and social-media reporting rather than an official hospital or police statement.

The absence of major Dutch-media coverage is itself notable. If this had already become a national political controversy inside the Netherlands, one would ordinarily expect coverage by organizations such as NOS, RTL Nieuws, or Nieuwsuur. I have not found evidence that they have yet elevated it to that level.

My assessment is that the story is currently in an awkward stage: the video is internationally viral, but the official Dutch fact-finding process appears to be proceeding more slowly than the spread of the footage. Until the police review is completed, many of the strongest claims being circulated online cannot yet be independently verified.

If your interest is whether this incident is likely to become a major Dutch political issue, the key development to watch would be whether the police review concludes that the officer violated Dutch use-of-force rules. That finding would be much more likely to trigger parliamentary questions, NGO involvement, and broader national media coverage than the video alone.

——

MY COMMENTS:

The Dutch Government routinely lies through its teeth, and covers-up relentlessly, as I documented here. At the time of that news-report (7 October 2019), Mark Rutte had already been the Prime Minister of Netherlands for 9 years, and he left that post in 2024 to become the Secretary General of America’s anti-Russian military alliance NATO. So, he personally was responsible for assisting and hiding the U.S.-installed Ukrainian government’s false-flag shoot-down on 14 July 2014 of the MH17 Malaysian airliner (producing 283 corpses, of whom 193 had been Dutch passengers) that Ukraine had guided over its civil-war zone in Donbass and blamed Russia for having shot it down, and he okayed the secret agreement with Ukraine (signed on 8 August 2014) to give Ukraine veto-power over any U.S.-and-allied official investigation and finding of whom had shot it down. Obama had told Ukraine to do it.  As I stated in that 7 October 2019 news-report:

President Obama not only perpetrated the February 2014 bloody coup in Ukraine which he had started by no later than 2011 to plan and placed into operation on 1 March 2013 inside the U.S. Embassy in Kiev (months before the democratically elected Ukrainian President whom he was to overthrow decided for Ukraine not to accept the EU’s offer of membership), but Obama and his NATO were so determined to reverse the coup’s resulting breakaway, from Ukraine, of Ukraine's two most anti-nazi districts, Crimea and Donetsk, that Obama and his NATO then set up the shoot-down of the MH17 airliner by Obama's newly-installed nazi Ukrainian government, with the objective being to promptly blame it against Russia. Obama was, at that time, in early July 2014, desperate for there to be a pretext on which the European Union would join the U.S. in greatly hiking sanctions against Russia regarding Ukraine. What the most-recent information will show is this: Obama and his NATO were intending to use this false accusation against Russia as a pretext not only to hike anti-Russia sanctions but ultimately to invade both Donetsk and Crimea and risk WW III in order to coerce those two regions back again into Ukraine — now to become (like the rest of Ukraine) under the control of the U.S. regime. The reasons why that plan failed (was aborted) were, first, that Malaysia’s Government held in international law the unchallengeable right of ownership over the airliner’s black boxes; and, second, that there was especially one member of NATO, Angela Merkel, who refused to risk WW III and to join into Obama’s extremely psychopathic scheme, since it risked the whole world over his determination to grab the entirety of Ukraine. Obama always refused to proceed forward with a geostrategic plan if it was strongly opposed by at least one core ally — in this particular instance, he knew enough not to drive Germany to abandon NATO and to ally with Russia (especially since Russia itself was his actual target in his coup to take over Ukraine). By declining to move forward without Merkel, all of those immediate risks to the world were avoided. Furthermore, Malaysia’s holding the black boxes was especially a problem for Obama and NATO, because any preparation for a U.S.-NATO invasion of Donbass and Crimea would spark Malaysia to go public with what it already knew about the U.S.-NATO lies regarding the MH17 incident. Obama possessed no ability to prevent that response from Malaysia. Not only Germany, but also Malaysia, possessed power in this situation, and Obama, fortunately, yielded to it. (Of course, the great worry about Trump is that if he gets into a similar situation, he might move forward regardless.) 

Also noteworthy — especially for Dutch citizens and the families of the passengers on that airliner — the Netherlands Government had been one of the largest financial backers of the February 2014 U.S.-planned overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected President. For example, it was the largest single donor, listed at $793,089, to Hromadske TV, which was the leading station that advocated for forcing that President out of power. Whereas the U.S. Government had organized and ran the overthrow, and spent far more on it (over $5 billion) than did any other nation or individual, the U.S. was only the second-largest donor to that station, at $399,650. So: Holland’s government had a significant investment in the post-coup regime, even before that post-coup regime shot down the MH17 plane and thereby slaughtered its 283 passengers, of whom 193 were Dutch. This is yet another reason why the Dutch Government’s heading this investigation in which Ukraine — another member — should be a suspect but is instead a juror, nullifies any rational authority to its ‘findings’.

One of my more important early news-reports regarding the MH17 case was the 24 August 2014 “MH-17 ‘Investigation’: Secret August 8th Agreement Seeps Out”, which article, referenced near the opening of the present article, documented that the secret agreement amongst the 4-party official MH17 ‘investigative’ team — Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, and Ukraine — gave each one of those governments an absolute veto over any public announcement or ‘finding’ from the ‘investigation’, so that if Ukraine, which was a prime suspect in the incident, were to disapprove a ‘finding’, then the team wouldn’t be allowed to issue it. This is like giving a murder-suspect veto-power over the investigation into the murder. It shows how poisoned that whole official ‘investigation’ was, even at its very start. This is important to understand.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.