Dehai News

https://ericzuesse.substack.com/p/is-the-us-government-nazi

https://theduran.com/is-the-u-s-government-nazi/

Is the U.S. Government nazi?

9 April 2025, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)

It depends on how you define the term “nazi”: either as the ideology ONLY of Germany’s former Nazi political Party; or else as the ideology of ANY national socialist or social nationalist Party ANYWHERE. If you use the first definition, then, of course, no other nation can even POSSIBLY have a Party that is nazi. That definition is convenient for non-German national socialist Parties, because it allows them not to associate themselves with the extremely unpopular losing side in WW2.

I use the second definition, because I am NOT a nazi propagandist (which abound in U.S.-and-allied countries). And according to THIS definition (which is so carefully avoided in U.S.-and-allied countries), the question that is being asked will first require a fuller definition that’s as clear, full, and abstract-as-possible (so as NOT to limit it arbitrarily to ONLY the former German Party, the first official Nazi Party). I give this definition of “nazism” as: Any ideology that is ethnic (‘racist’, religious, nationalist, or otherwise) supremacist imperialist (expansionist), so that it advocates at least two mutually hostile legal classes (“us” versus “them”) and grants both rights and obligations to “us,” but ONLY obligations to “them,” who are, consequently, either serfs (in debt-bondage to “us”) or slaves (property of “us,” so that “we” have a right to use, or dispose of, “them,” as we wish). That IS the nazi ideology, instead of ONLY the Nazi Party; and it DOES greatly threaten the world TODAY, in the same way that Hitler’s did, though its targeted groups are DIFFERENT. For examples: Whereas Germany’s nazis (the Nazi Party) targeted Jews for extermination, and Russians for slavery, the post-WW2 America’s nazis (now called “neoconservatives” or “neocons”) target Russians and Chinese for extermination, and target opponents of neoconservatism for slavery; and Israel’s nazis (Zionists everywhere) target Palestinians for extermination (in accord with their Biblical Commandments) and anti-Zionists for slavery. The nazi ideology is just as supremacist, and just as ‘racist’, and just as aggressive, and just as uncompromising, no matter where it exists. (Today’s German nazis are people like the current Chancellor, Friedrich Merz.)

Among the non-German nazis who waged war in alliance with Germany’s Nazis and then became hidden agents of the U.S. Government (and of its colonies such as West Germany) after WW2, were:

STEPAN BANDERA. He was a Ukrainian nazi who is accurately and also inaccurately described by the CIA-edited and written Wikipedia (which blacklists (blocks from linking to) sites that aren’t CIA-approved). For example, in the following excerpt from their “Stepan Bandera” article:

Historian Per Anders Rudling said that Bandera and his followers "advocated the selective breeding to create a 'pure' Ukrainian race",^[13] and that "the OUN shared the fascist attributes of anti-liberalism, anti-conservatism, and anti-communism, an armed party, totalitarianism, antisemitism, Führerprinzip, and adoption of fascist greetings. Its leaders eagerly emphasized to Hitler and Ribbentrop that they shared the Nazi Weltanschauung and a commitment to a fascist New Europe."^[118]

That phrase “anti-conservatism” to describe Bandera, is, of course, false, because the entire OUN were conservative, and Bandera’s wing of it was extremely conservative, in every way, fully qualifying to be called nazi (as is defined here). The fact that some followers of the OUN were LESS conservative than Bandera’s OUN-B was, doesn’t mean (as the CIA’s Wikipedia falsely assumes) that he was actually “anti-conservative.” The U.S. Government does not want the public to know that it has been, and is, protecting the followers of OUN, including especially followers of Bandera’s nazi wing of it, OUN-B.

The article also says:

Neither Bandera nor OUN have been used as national symbols by the current Ukrainian government. Ukrainian president Zelensky has not presented Bandera or his associates as national heroes. Nevertheless, the memory of Bandera can be found in Ukraine.^[138]

However, back on 23 March 2010 — after the U.S.-instigated ‘Orange Revolution’ that in 2005 had installed Viktor Yushchenko as President, who subsequently became replaced by the neutralist Viktor Yanukovych earlier in 2010, whom the U.S. Government then finally successfully overthrew in a U.S. coup in 2014 — even America’s Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty headlined “Yushchenko Defends Making Bandera, Shukhevych 'Heroes Of Ukraine'”, and both of those ‘heroes’ had been pro-Hitler. And, on 18 April 2019, Volodmyr Zelensky, in an interview, said of the many public monuments to Bandera in Ukraine, “That's fine. There are undeniable heroes. Stepan Bandera is a hero for a certain percentage of Ukrainians, and this is normal and cool. This is one of those people who defended the freedom of Ukraine.” So, that statement by Wikipedia — “Zelensky has not presented Bandera or his associates as national heroes” — is a lie (even on the basis of the CIA’s own accepted sources, such as RL/RFE). And the reason why the nazi CIA would spread this lie is obvious.

On 7 April 2024, I wrote about the deep history of the post-FDR U.S. Government’s consistent efforts to assist Ukraine’s nazis to help defeat first the Soviet Union and then Russia, and headlined “How & Why the UK, U.S., and Canada, Governments imported Nazis into Canada”, and those people had been passionate supporters of Hitler, and haters of Russia — President Truman almost immediately supported them, as have all, or virtually all, subsequent U.S. Presidents. And on 25 September 2023, the New York Times headlined “Canada’s House Speaker Apologizes After Ukrainian Who Fought for Nazis Was Honored: Jewish groups demanded an explanation after Anthony Rota, the speaker of Canada’s House of Commons, introduced a 98-year-old veteran of an SS unit as a ‘hero’.” They all rose onto their feet and applauded this ‘hero’. This nazi Jewish [otherwise known as “Zionist”] newspaper hid from their readers how favorably that anti-Semitic ‘hero’ had been received. But even Wikipedia (which is actually less censorious than America’s major ‘news’-media are) opened their ”Yaroslav Hunka scandal” article:

On 22 September 2023, Yaroslav Hunka, a Ukrainian Canadian who fought in the SS Division Galicia of the military wing of the Nazi Party, the Waffen-SS, was invited to the House of Commons of Canada to be recognized by Speaker Anthony Rota, the Member of Parliament for Hunka's district. Hunka received two standing ovations from all house members, including Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, other party leaders, and visiting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

I provided lots more evidence in my 1 March 2024 “The nazi ideology thrives in The West.”, documenting, in depth, that the U.S. Government is nazi; and, in my 24 July 2020 “How the Cold War, Which Never Actually Stopped, Actually Started”, I documented how and why it started on 25 July 1945 to be the successor to Hitler’s regime. The standard ‘understanding’ of U.S. foreign policy after World War Two is loaded with lies.

The only way that nazism can (and does) succeed is by deceiving the public, and the main way it’s done is by censoring-out the key truths about itself and about the world — and, especially, key truths about history. This lying is done mainly by censorship. And, yet, throughout the U.S. empire, censorship is held to be the only way to protect truth. Censorship is instead fundamental to every dictatorship; and the U.S. empire — like every empire throughout history — is based upon it.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.