Dehai News

https://ericzuesse.substack.com/p/vanessa-beeley-explains-the-reality

https://theduran.com/vanessa-beeley-explains-the-reality-in-the-middle-east/

Vanessa Beeley EXPLAINS the REALITY in the Middle East

24 June 2025, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)

https://beeley.substack.com/p/chaos-in-the-middle-east-humanity

"Trying to join all the shifting dots in West Asia"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEnMX59qUvU

Vanessa Beeley (who has spent most of her life there) DOES explain it, brilliantly.

What U.S.-allied ‘news’-media refuse to report to their victims (subscribers etc.) is what she presents there; so, in that exceptionally good interview of her, these facts that are being hidden from U.S.-and-allied publics are all stated and laid out, in the uncompromisingly truthful way she always does.

My only comment to add to it (and perhaps modify it in some way) concerns this passage:

7:43

INTERVIEWER: Most people, most people say, it [Israel] started in [19]48. BEELEY: No it didn’t. It started in 1917 with the

7:49

Balffour treaty [no, that was no treaty, and it was titled the “Balfour Declaration,” it was no international agreement at all; and this “Declaration” by the British Government during WW1 was] the giving of Palestine um you know to the Rothschilds [As Wikipedia says: “announcing its support for the establishment of a ‘national home for the Jewish people’ in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.” And, so, Balfour had Rothschild oversee the organized importation of Jews into that region of Arabia, to ultimately transfer control of that region, from the UK to a future ‘Israel’, answerable to the UK Government and its billionaires], basically um, and and from that point on,

7:57

of course, uh the European um settlers started to come in in force. Uh 1948 was

8:05

basically after the British had left and handed it over to the UN to carve up the

8:11

country in favor of the Zionists. And so that was what basically led to um the

8:19

intensive ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, of course, under the training, um, of the British, particularly

8:27

a British general Orde Wingate who trained the Hagana [the chief Jewish terrorist organization in Palestine during the period of the post-WW1 (League of Nations, Versailles Treaty, British “Mandate”) control 1920-1948 — the aim being for UK’s billionaires temporarily to control Palestine until in 1948 their permanent but proxy (Israeli) control], um in how to successfully ethnic cleanse, uh

8:34

ethnically cleanse entire villages and towns in Palestine.

8:41

I would ALSO add that by the time of 1948, Rothschilds’ control over England temporarily lapsed when the progressive, then Labour Party’s, Clement Attlee, became elected on 5 July 1945 Prime Minister by ousting Rothschild’s Winston Churchill, which was an extraordinarily democratic transition away from imperialism. Imperialism serves the owners of the arms industry (who were donors to the political career of  Churchill, who consequently served themselves — Britain’s war-profiteers). The Attlee Government became, though only briefly, ANTI-imperialistic and pro-social-welfare-oriented (which was Attlee). However, by 1948, Truman had already started the Cold War (‘justifying’ U.S. global expansionism) by taking the advices of both the Rhodesist-Rothschild’s Churchill, and the equally pro-imperialism Dwight Eisenhower, their advice, to rebuild Britain’s and America’s weapons-producers and establish both the CIA and the ‘Defense’ Department, the military-industrial complex, etc., for more wars (very profitable for the billionaires in both UK and U.S.). However, even after Attlee became a servant to Truman’s obsession for Churchill’s Rothschilds-Rhodes plan for ‘Churchill’s’ “Special Relationship” with the U.S., Attee STILL opposed Zionism, and rejected the Balfour Declaration. This was in 1945-1948. Here is from a reliable comprehensive source on the entire matter:

During Roosevelt’s ‘first three terms’, writes Frank E. Manual (The Realities of American–Palestine Relations [1949]), ‘the State Department adhered strictly to the basic position…that the Jewish National Home provisions of the mandate, were not an “American interest”’, officials resenting ‘what they considered the unwarranted intervention of American Zionists in the conduct of foreign policy’.

With Truman’s accession in April 1945, however, official interest in Palestine became markedly more pronounced. … Bad relations between the two countries [U.S.-UK] on the issue persisted thereafter, seriously damaging any prospect of successful collaborative effort to resolve the dilemmas. … Ernest Bevin, with the anxious perspectives of the Foreign Office, complained in the House of Commons that Britain as the mandatory power should have been consulted in advance. … The Americans had largely called the shots, to the marked dismay of the British: ‘unanimity was preserved’, writes Amikam Nachmani, ‘by British capitulation to U.S. demands.’… The Attlee government rejected the findings in some anger, holding that they had been badly let down by the Commission’s procedures and priorities. Ernest Bevin’s friend and biographer Francis Williams, observing that the report had been issued without ‘even a courtesy consultation with Britain’, described the foreign secretary as falling into ‘one of the blackest rages I ever saw him in’. America had acted with ‘unparalled irresponsibility in a period of acute tension when British soldiers were being killed by illegal Jewish terrorist forces’. (Ernest Bevin. Portrait of a Great Englishman [1952].) … Whatever the balance of competence and understanding, the mutual animosity afflicting Washington and London formed a pitiful basis for any common action to secure a settlement in Palestine. Even the two judges leading the American and British parts of the Commission, Joseph Hutcheson and Sir John Singleton, were at daggers drawn for much of the time: they ‘could hardly bear each other’, comments Amikam Nachmani. … Accordingly, on 15 May 1947, three months after the London collapse (and exactly a year before the end of the Mandate), the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was set up. … While all this was taking place in the distant councils of London and New York, realities on the ground in Palestine – most particularly an extending and bloody civil war between Arabs and Jews – were making nonsense of the portentous debates, plans, reports, and votes. The new hope for the future, the United Nations, had no physical means at its disposal, or international agreement thereto, to impose any settlement. …

That last sentence there was true because it had been Truman’s specific design: he, more than any other single person, created the U.N.’s Charter, precisely so as to strip it of the enforcement-means that were essential to the U.N.’s inventor, FDR’s plan for the U.N.’s ultimate Charter. When Truman made his final decision on 25 July 1945 for the U.S. Government ultimately to take over the entire world — for which reason he wouldn’t allow any effective U.N. — already what the Rhodesist Churchill in 1946 called “the Special Relationship” was to become really the U.S. empire absorbing into itself whatever remained of the former British Empire. However, after U.S. President Kennedy’s assassination in 1963, this has actually been Israel’s empire; America is Israel’s slave. But Truman’s gullibility (to the Rothschild-Rhodes-Churchill scheme) was the turning-point in all of this; the Balfour Declaration wasn’t really. If Beeley thinks I am wrong on this, I invite her to say publicy or privately what in this narrative is false. All that’s in question here is purely what the actual historical turning-point was that has produced the current Middle-Eastern situation that Beeley so superbly described. But it seems to me that after Truman and Attlee came into power replacing FDR and Churchill, the U.S. was in the drivers’ seat to create the Cold War and Israel; UK was not — and, starting on 25 July 1945, he rushed forth ceaselessly to do that. Truman was therefore the key (I currently can’t see it in any other way), and ‘historians’ (perhaps even ones that Beeley has been relying upon) are ignorant of this — the most important fact in order to understand the post-WW2 world.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.