World News

Similarities Between Hitler and Biden

Posted by:

Date: Wednesday, 01 March 2023

Similarities Between Hitler and Biden

Eric Zuesse

Everyone knows about the differences between Hitler and Biden (and there are plenty of commentators who argue only on the basis of those endlessly emphasized differences), but no one even so much as just mentions their equally important similarities, which will be pointed out here, in order to indicate, in regards to today’s U.S. policies toward China, what the United States Government took upon itself from the Nazis after the Soviet Union defeated Hitler and forced his suicide unless Hitler was to capitulate to Soviet forces — which he chose not to do: he chose suicide instead):

On February 28th, the Wall Street Journal headlined “Huawei Export Licenses Could be Revoked by U.S.”, and reported that, “‘The policy that had allowed exports to Huawei, notwithstanding the entity listing, is being wound down,’ said a former senior security official familiar with the administration’s policy deliberations. ‘The White House is now telling Commerce, ‘Cut off the 4G sales, the time has come to do more pain to Huawei, to try to finish their demise’,’ the former official said.” 

The U.S. Administration has said many times that China is America’s chief enemy. The standard way of doing that is such as the secret 2022 Biden Administration-announced but nonetheless secret Biden 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS), which, allegedly, asserts that “the Department of Defense’s most urgent priority is competing with China”

The neoliberal-libertarian American pro-imperialism magazine National Interest, which is politically bipartisan, anticipated that NDS by headlining on 14 September 2022 “The U.S. Needs to Harness Big Tech to Compete With China”, by “Dan Gouré Ph.D.” identified there as “a vice president at the public-policy research think tank Lexington Institute [exposed, behind paywalls, as being “an advertising firm on retainer for the defense industry”; and, so, National Interest magazine’s article is, in some manner or other, reasonably to be presumed to be paid advertising, not paid ‘editorial’ content. In addition: Lexington Institute is a neoliberal-neoconservative, or pro-imperialism libertarian, operation, that therefore campaigns also for fossil-fuels corporate interests and against governmental regulations.]. Gouré has a background in the public sector and U.S. federal government, most recently serving as a member of the 2001 [G.W. Bush] Department of Defense Transition Team [and thus shares responsibility for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which benefitted petroleum companies].” Gouré’s article opened:

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the democratic world’s most significant strategic challenge and the United States’ pacing military competitor. Beijing has achieved this status primarily because of its growing economic power and enormous technological progress over the past half-century. China is seeking to build on this success by becoming dominant in a set of critical advanced technologies which, if successful, would give it economic, military, and even political dominance over the entire world. Countering this threat from China requires that the United States support and harness the creative energy and technical know-how of its successful Big Tech firms.

The Biden administration has made it clear that it views China as the most significant strategic competitor to the United States. China’s growing economic power provides leverage for furthering Beijing’s political and strategic initiatives.

The NDS allegedly rates Russia as being America’s #2 enemy. There is no indication that either China or Russia referred to America as being any sort of enemy, prior to America’s having (unofficially) declared both of them to be enemies of America: the hostile propaganda in this renewed Cold War started on America’s side and is only being responded-to by its ‘enemies’.

America’s neoliberal-neoconservative Center for Strategic and International Studies headlined on 27 October 2022, “2022 National Defense Strategy: Implications for China and the Indo-Pacific”, and reported that, “The NDS argues that the Department of Defense’s most urgent priority is competing with China.”

What is especially interesting to me about the Biden Administration’s terminological choices here is that America’s alleged ‘Defense’ Department is allegedly being tasked with “competition” (a broad term that’s far commoner in economic than in military contexts) instead of with “conquest” or “winning” or with “defeating an enemy” (which is what a “War Department” — which America’s Founders had created in 1789 and President Truman in 1947 replaced with an actual Aggression Department that is officially called “the Defense Department” (something — “defense” — that it has never done, because no one ever invaded America after WW II — if even then). Truman created the “standing army” that America’s Founders had done all they could to outlaw. He created the permanent-war  Military-Industrial Complex or “MIC” in 1947, and also the secret police or CIA — the international coup-creating agency — in that same year, in order to build the all-encompassing global American empire of ‘allies’ or colonies, after Hitler’s plan to build such global hegemony for Germany had been defeated in 1945. Truman took up that global-hegemonic banner, for America (instead of for Germany). And Biden today — not Hitler — is its champion.

As regards Huawei specifically, here is the current status of America’s war to destroy that Chinese corporation. As one can see there, the U.S. Government is leading all of its ‘allies’ to destroy Huawei Corporation, though many U.S.-and-allied corporations will themselves be damaged by America’s war against that Chinese high-tech giant. The aim is more to destroy than to build.

Hitler was the same in all of these respects, but his version was far more racist than America’s (at least overtly) is. (Also, Hitler’s opposition to abortions was far more like Trump’s position than like Biden’s, because whereas Trump was a conservative fascist, Biden is a liberal fascist. There are differences, but all of these rulers are clearly fascists.)

Here was Hitler’s version, his plan for all-encompassing German global empire or hegemony, which he completed writing in 1928, before he even entered power and began executing the plan; his is against America as the biggest threat to Germany’s becoming master of the world, instead of against China as the biggest threat to America’s becoming master of the world, but otherwise there are remarkable similarities between Biden and Hitler, in international relations:


Hitler, SECOND BOOK, 1928: Excerpts about America:

“With the American union, a new power of such dimensions has come into being as threatens to upset the whole former power and orders of rank of the states.” “Neither the present living space [Lebensraum] nor that achieved by a restoration of the borders of 1914 will allow us to lead a life analogous to that of the American Folk. If we want this, either our Folk’s territory must be considerably enlarged, or the German economy will again have to embark upon paths already known to us since the pre-war period. Power is necessary in both cases. Specifically, first of all, in the sense of a restoration of our Folk’s inner strength, and then in a military mounting of this strength.” “Even now, the American union is emerging in all fields as the strongest competitor against all European nations competing as export nations for the world’s markets. The size and the wealth of her domestic market permits production figures and thereby production equipment which so reduce manufacturing costs that, despite enormous wages, it no longer seems possible to undercut her prices. Here the development of the automobile industry may be considered as a warning example. … We must also look on as American cars spread alarmingly even to our own country. This is possible only because the size of her domestic market, her wealth in purchasing power and also in raw materials, guarantees the American automobile industry domestic sales figures which alone make possible manufacturing methods which in Europe would be impossible on account of the absence of these domestic sales potentials. The American automobile industry’s enormous export possibilities result from this.” “It is no accident that the American Union is the State in which at the present time most inventions are being made by far, some of which are of an incredible boldness. Americans, as a young, racially select Folk, confront Old Europe, which has continually lost much of its best blood through war and emigration. Just as little as one can equate the accomplishment of one thousand degenerate Levantines in Europe, say in Crete, with the accomplishment of one thousand racially still more valuable Germans or Englishmen, so can one just as little equate the accomplishment of one thousand racially questionable Europeans to the capacity of one thousand racially highly valuable Americans. Only a conscious Folkish race policy would be able to save European nations from losing the law of action to America, in consequence of the inferior value of European Folks vis-à-vis the American Folk. If in place of this, however, the German Folk, along with a bastardisation systematically conducted by Jews with inferior human material and a lowering of its racial value as such caused thereby, also lets its best bloodbearers be taken away by a continuation of emigration in hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of individual specimens, it will slowly sink to the level of an equally inferior race, and hence to that of an incompetent and valueless Folk. The danger is especially great since, because of the complete indifference on our side, the American Union itself, inspired by the teachings of its own ethnologists, has established special standards for immigration. By making entry to American soil dependent on definite racial prerequisites on the one hand, as well as on the definite physical health of the individual as such, bleeding Europe of its best people has, indeed, perforce been legally regulated. This is something which our whole so called national bourgeois world and all its economic politicians either do not see, or, at least, will not hear of because it is unpleasant to them, and because it is much cheaper to pass over these things with a couple of general national phrases. To this lowering, imposed by Nature, of the general value of our Folk by forced emigration in consequence of our economic policy, is added birth control as a second disadvantage. I have already set forth the consequences of the fight against the child. They lie in a reduction of the count of individuals brought to life, so that a further selection cannot take place. On the contrary, people take pains that all who are once born are kept alive under any circumstances. Since, however, ability, energy, and so on, are not necessarily connected with the first born, but instead become visible in each case only in the course of the struggle for existence, the possibility of a weeding out and a selection according to such criteria is removed. Nations become impoverished in talents and energies. Again, this is especially bad in nations in which the dissimilarity of basic racial elements extends even into families.” “Just as here history was slowly shaped by the racially more valuable Folks of the Occident, the danger likewise arises that the importance of racially inferior Europe slowly is leading to a new determination of the world's fate by the Folk of the North American continent.” “In the far future it may be possible to think of a new association of nations, consisting of individual States with a high national value, which could then stand up to the threatening overwhelming of the world by the American Union.”


Whereas Hitler was the chief person responsible for tens of millions of entirely unnecessarily miserable and premature deaths in WW II, Biden might become the chief person who will be responsible for billions — thousands of millions — of entirely unnecessarily miserable and premature deaths in a WW III against both Russia and China. If Biden is competing with Hitler, Biden will easily ‘win’ — because, this time, it would be done with nuclear weapons.


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

ERi-TV, Eritrea - ጸብጻብ ዑደት ፕረዚደንት ኢሳይያስ ኣፈወርቂ ኣብ ዋዕላ ደቡብ ኮርያ አፍሪቃ | Reportage on President Isaias Afwerki's visit to South Korea for the South Korea-Africa Summit, held from June 3-4

Dehai Events